The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research?
Abstract
Collaborations between scientists and volunteers have the potential to broaden the scope of research and enhance the ability to collect scientific data. Interested members of the public may contribute valuable information as they learn about wildlife in their local communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits
Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636 · Cited by 1,914
The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason
Bourdieu, P. (1975) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847501400602 · Cited by 1,483
Assessing data quality in citizen science
Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., & Simmons, B. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1436 · Cited by 985
Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data
Boakes, E. H., McGowan, P. J. K., Fuller, R. A., Chang-qing, D., Clark, N. E., O'Connor, K., & Mace, G. M. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385 · Cited by 824
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., & Thiel, M. (2013) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohn, J. P.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 192-197
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2166658986
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1641/b580303
- The paper
- Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1641/b580303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.