The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions
Open accessAbstract
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Thousands of industrial-scale wind turbines are being built across the world each year to meet the growing demand for sustainable energy. Bats of certain species are dying at wind turbines in unprecedented numbers. Species of bats consistently affected by turbines tend to be those that rely on trees as roosts and most migrate long distances. Although considerable progress has been made in recent years toward better understanding the problem, the causes of bat fatalities at turbines remain unclear. In this synthesis, we review hypothesized causes of bat fatalities at turbines. Hypotheses of cause fall into 2 general categories—proximate and ultimate. Proximate causes explain the direct means by which bats die at turbines and include collision with towers and rotating blades, and barotrauma. Ultimate causes explain why bats come close to turbines and include 3 general types: random collisions, coincidental collisions, and collisions that result from attraction of bats to turbines. The random collision hypothesis posits that interactions between bats and turbines are random events and that fatalities are representative of the bats present at a site. Coincidental hypotheses posit that certain aspects of bat distribution or behavior put them at risk of collision and include aggregation during migration and seasonal increases in flight activity associated with feeding or mating. A surprising number of attraction hypotheses suggest that bats might be attracted to turbines out of curiosity, misperception, or as potential feeding, roosting, flocking, and mating opportunities. Identifying, prioritizing, and testing hypothesized causes of bat collisions with wind turbines are vital steps toward developing practical solutions to the problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Economic Importance of Bats in Agriculture
Boyles, J. G., Cryan, P. M., McCracken, G. F., & Kunz, T. H. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201366 · Cited by 903
Self-citationLarge-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States: Assessment of Opportunities and Barriers
Musial, W., & Ram, B. (2010) · doi:10.2172/990101 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Cryan, P. M., & Barclay, R. M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12-15
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1330-1340
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W1986608058
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1644/09-mamm-s-076r1.1
- The paper
- Cryan, P. M., & Barclay, R. M. R. (2009). Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-mamm-s-076r1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.