Cited by 22Evolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

A new genus for the Andean mice Akodon latebricola and A. bogotensis(Rodentia: Sigmodontinae)

Open access
Alvarado-Serrano, Diego F., D'Elía, Guillermo·2013·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

Akodontini is the 2nd most diverse tribe of Sigmodontinae, which in turn is one of the most speciose groups of muroid rodents. This tribe is among the most poorly understood Neotropical taxa, with most taxonomic problems concentrated in Andean species, especially those inhabiting the northern Andes. Here, applying morphological, morphometric, and phylogenetic analyses (based on 1 mitochondrial and 1 nuclear gene), we review the systematic and taxonomic status of the Bogotá akodont, Akodon bogotensis Thomas, 1895, and the Ecuadorean akodont, A. latebricola (Anthony, 1924) (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). Morphometric and morphological analyses give evidence of the morphological distinctiveness of A. latebricola and A. bogotensis. Specifically, these small-sized species present a unique combination of characters that includes soft, grizzled to dark chestnut dorsal fur; dark brown manus, pes, and tail; slender and proportionally long rostra; indistinct zygomatic notches; narrow, backward-sloping zygomatic plates; wedge-shaped infraorbital foramina; proportionally short incisive foramina; inflated braincase and auditory bullae; and opposite molar cusps. In agreement with these morphological results, phylogenetic analyses placed latebricola outside the tribe Akodontini. Based on these results, we propose and describe a new genus for latebricola and bogotensis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1644/12-mamm-a-276.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neomicroxus latebricola was known to inhabit Andean forests of northern Ecuador, and its potential presence in southern Colombia has been hypothesized.

    “This rodent was known to inhabit Andean forests of northern Ecuador, and its potential presence in southern Colombia has been hypothesized (Alvarado-Serrano & D'Elía 2013;Alvarado Serrano 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alvarado-Serrano, D. F., & D'Elía, G.
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
995-1015
ISSN
  • 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1542
OpenAlex
W2151968979
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Mammalogy (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
Akodontini, Sigmodontinae, new genus, rodent taxonomy, morphometrics, phylogenetic relationships, northern Andes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review