WOLF–BISON INTERACTIONS IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wolves are inefficient predators with generally low hunting success (about 20%), partly because of the large size and defensive capabilities of their prey.
“Wolves are inefficient predators with generally low hunting success (»20%; Smith et al. 2000) due, in part, to the large size and defensive capabilities of their prey.”
From Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system (2007) · cites this paper as Smith et al. 2000
Some authors reported that female mice form stable territories (overlapping with male ones) also outside breeding season.
“Some authors reported that females form stable territories (overlapping with male ones) also outside breeding season.74,75”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [75]
This type of social organization promotes maximal dispersal, at least up to a point when defending individual territories becomes impossible.
“This type of social organization promotes maximal dispersal, at least up to a point when defending individual territories becomes impossible.75,88”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [75]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Smith, D. W., Mech, L. D., Meagher, M., Clark, W. E., Jaffe, R., Phillips, M. K., & Mack, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Published
- 2000
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
