The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vascular Damage as an Underlying Mechanism of Cardiac and Cerebral Toxicity in Irradiated Cancer Patients
Abstract
Radiation is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in cancer patients. Modern radiotherapy techniques reduce the volume of the heart and major coronary vessels exposed to high doses, but some exposure is often unavoidable. Radiation damage to the myocardium is caused primarily by inflammatory changes in the microvasculature, leading to microthrombi and occlusion of vessels, reduced vascular density, perfusion defects and focal ischemia. This is followed by progressive myocardial cell death and fibrosis. Clinical studies also demonstrate regional perfusion defects in non-symptomatic breast cancer patients after radiotherapy. The incidence and extent of perfusion defects are related to the volume of left ventricle included in the radiation field. Irradiation of endothelial cells lining large vessels also increases expression of inflammatory molecules, leading to adhesion and transmigration of circulating monocytes. In the presence of elevated cholesterol, invading monocytes transform into activated macrophages and form fatty streaks in the intima, thereby initiating the process of atherosclerosis. Experimental studies have shown that radiation predisposes to the formation of inflammatory plaque, which is more likely to rupture and cause a fatal heart attack or stroke. This paper presents a brief overview of the current knowledge on mechanisms for development of radiation-induced cardiovascular and cerebrovascular damage. It does not represent a comprehensive review of the literature, but reference is made to several excellent recent reviews on the topic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inflammation in atherosclerosis
Libby, P. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01323 · Cited by 8,315
Cited by
Lancellotti, P., Nkomo, V. T., Badano, L. P., Bergler, J., Bogaert, J., Davin, L., Cosyns, B., Coucke, P., Dulgheru, R., Edvardsen, T., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.005 · Cited by 484
Lancellotti, P., Nkomo, V. T., Badano, L. P., Bergler-Klein, J., Bogaert, J., Davin, L., Cosyns, B., Coucke, P., Dulgheru, R., Edvardsen, T., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet123 · Cited by 353
Long-Term and Latent Side Effects of Specific Cancer Types
Gegechkori, N., Haines, L., & Lin, J. J. (2017) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2017.06.003 · Cited by 286
Azizova, T. V., Bannikova, M. V., Grigoryeva, E. S., Rybkina, V. L., & Hamada, N. (2020) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz230 · Cited by 93
Kreuzer, M., Auvinen, A., Cardis, E., Hall, J., Jourdain, J.-R., Laurier, D., Little, M. P., Peters, A., Raj, K., Russell, N. S., et al. (2015) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.03.002 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, F. A., Hoving, S., & Russell, N. S.
- Venue
- Radiation Research
- Publisher
- Radiation Research Society
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 6b
- Pages
- 865-869
- ISSN
- 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5404
- OpenAlex
- W2109694775
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vascular Damage as an Underlying Mechanism of Cardiac and Cerebral Toxicity in Irradiated Cancer Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1667/rr1862.1
- The paper
- Stewart, F. A., Hoving, S., & Russell, N. S. (2010). Vascular Damage as an Underlying Mechanism of Cardiac and Cerebral Toxicity in Irradiated Cancer Patients. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr1862.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.