Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Animal Models for Medical Countermeasures to Radiation Exposure

Open access
Williams, Jacqueline P., Brown, Stephen L., Georges, George E., Hauer-Jensen, Martin, Hill, Richard P., Huser, Amy K., Kirsch, David G., MacVittie, Thomas J., Mason, Kathy A., Medhora, Meetha M., Moulder, John E., Okunieff, Paul, Otterson, Mary F., Robbins, Michael E., Smathers, James B., McBride, William H.·2010·Radiation Research

Abstract

Since September 11, 2001, there has been the recognition of a plausible threat from acts of terrorism, including radiological or nuclear attacks. A network of Centers for Medical Countermeasures against Radiation (CMCRs) has been established across the U.S.; one of the missions of this network is to identify and develop mitigating agents that can be used to treat the civilian population after a radiological event. The development of such agents requires comparison of data from many sources and accumulation of information consistent with the "Animal Rule" from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Given the necessity for a consensus on appropriate animal model use across the network to allow for comparative studies to be performed across institutions, and to identify pivotal studies and facilitate FDA approval, in early 2008, investigators from each of the CMCRs organized and met for an Animal Models Workshop. Working groups deliberated and discussed the wide range of animal models available for assessing agent efficacy in a number of relevant tissues and organs, including the immune and hematopoietic systems, gastrointestinal tract, lung, kidney and skin. Discussions covered the most appropriate species and strains available as well as other factors that may affect differential findings between groups and institutions. This report provides the workshop findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rr1880.1

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 105 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Williams, J. P., Brown, S. L., Georges, G. E., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hill, R. P., Huser, A. K., Kirsch, D. G., MacVittie, T. J., Mason, K. A., Medhora, M. M., Moulder, J. E., Okunieff, P., Otterson, M. F., Robbins, M. E., Smathers, J. B., & McBride, W. H.
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2010-04
Volume
173
Issue
4
Pages
557-578
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W2130927464
Cited by
423
References
105
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal Models for Medical Countermeasures to Radiation Exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1667/rr1880.1
The paper
Williams, J. P., Brown, S. L., Georges, G. E., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hill, R. P., Huser, A. K., Kirsch, D. G., MacVittie, T. J., Mason, K. A., Medhora, M. M., Moulder, J. E., Okunieff, P., Otterson, M. F., Robbins, M. E., Smathers, J. B., & McBride, W. H. (2010). Animal Models for Medical Countermeasures to Radiation Exposure. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr1880.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.