The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterogeneity in Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair in Tumor and Normal Cells Measured Using the “Comet” Assay
Abstract
A method for measuring DNA damage to individual cells, based on the technique of microelectrophoresis, was described by Ostling and Johanson in 1984 (Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 123, 291-298). Cells embedded in agarose are lysed, subjected briefly to an electric field, stained with a fluorescent DNA-binding stain, and viewed using a fluorescence microscope. Broken DNA migrates farther in the electric field, and the cell then resembles a "comet" with a brightly fluorescent head and a tail region which increases as damage increases. We have used video image analysis to define appropriate "features" of the comet as a measure of DNA damage, and have quantified damage and repair by ionizing radiation. The assay was optimized for lysing solution, lysing time, electrophoresis time, and propidium iodide concentration using Chinese hamster V79 cells. To assess heterogeneity of response of normal versus malignant cells, damage to both tumor cells and normal cells within mouse SCC-VII tumors was assessed. Tumor cells were separated from macrophages using a cell-sorting method based on differential binding of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. The "tail moment", the product of the amount of DNA in the tail and the mean distance of migration in the tail, was the most informative feature of the comet image. Tumor and normal cells showed significant heterogeneity in damage produced by ionizing radiation, although the average amount of damage increased linearly with dose (0-15 Gy) and suggested similar net radiosensitivities for the two cell types. Similarly, DNA repair rate was not significantly different for tumor and normal cells, and most of the cells had repaired the damage by 30 min following exposure to 15 Gy. The heterogeneity in response did not appear to be a result of differences in response through the cell cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing
Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J.-C., & Sasaki, Y. F. (2000) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::aid-em8>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 4,860
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Molecular Mechanisms of Ultraviolet Radiation‐Induced DNA Damage and Repair
Rastogi, R. P., Richa, Kumar, A., Tyagi, M. B., & Sinha, R. P. (2010) · Journal of Nucleic Acids · doi:10.4061/2010/592980 · Cited by 1,329
“Commet assay (Single-cell gel Electrophoresis) Oxidative DNA damage and single/double strand break [100, 101]”
BackgroundMethodThe comet assay: what can it really tell us?
Collins, A. R., Dobson, V. L., Dušinská, M., Kennedy, G., & Štětina, R. (1997) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00013-4 · Cited by 668
Murr, R., Loizou, J. I., Yang, Y.-G., Cuenin, C., Li, H., Wang, Z.-Q., & Herceg, Z. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1343 · Cited by 613
Metadata
- Authors
- Olive, P. L., Banáth, J. P., & Durand, R. E.
- Venue
- Radiation Research
- Publisher
- Radiation Research Society
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- AV35-AV42
- ISSN
- 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5404
- OpenAlex
- W2139210450
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity in Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair in Tumor and Normal Cells Measured Using the “Comet” Assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1667/rrav04.1
- The paper
- Olive, P. L., Banáth, J. P., & Durand, R. E. (2012). Heterogeneity in Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair in Tumor and Normal Cells Measured Using the “Comet” Assay. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.1667/rrav04.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.