The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Borings in Cloudina Shells: Complex Predator-Prey Dynamics in the Terminal Neoproterozoic
Abstract
Other| February 01, 2003 Preservation Potential and Paleoecological Significance of Epibenthic Suspension Feeder-Dominated Benthic Communities (Northern Adriatic Sea) FRANK K. McKINNEY FRANK K. McKINNEY 1Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, Email:mckinneyfk@appstate.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information FRANK K. McKINNEY 1Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, Email:mckinneyfk@appstate.edu Publisher: SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology Accepted: 10 Jul 2002 First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-5323 Print ISSN: 0883-1351 Society for Sedimentary Geology PALAIOS (2003) 18 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018<0047:PPAPSO>2.0.CO;2 Article history Accepted: 10 Jul 2002 First Online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation FRANK K. McKINNEY; Preservation Potential and Paleoecological Significance of Epibenthic Suspension Feeder-Dominated Benthic Communities (Northern Adriatic Sea). PALAIOS 2003;; 18 (1): 47–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018<0047:PPAPSO>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyPALAIOS Search Advanced Search Abstract The benthic ecosystem off the northeastern Adriatic coast is composed largely of clades characteristic of Sepkoski's Modern Fauna. However, across broad expanses of fine-sediment substrate, attached epibenthic suspension feeders strongly dominate in some areas and are co-dominant with mobile epibenthic deposit feeders in other areas. Preservation of skeletal residues in these areas would be composed largely of remains of attached suspension feeders. Therefore, although composed largely of Modern Fauna clades, the benthic ecosystem and its potential fossil remains reflect Paleozoic rather than post-Paleozoic ecology. This Paleozoic-style benthic ecology corresponds with low-nutrient water, low intensity of grazing predation, and relatively few endobenthic bioturbators, all of which were more characteristic of Paleozoic than post-Paleozoic seas. The thriving epibenthic attached suspension-feeding benthos in the northeastern Adriatic apparently results from the interaction of all or a subset of these three conditions. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Fortunian rocks in Newfoundland and elsewhere, sophisticated strategies involving strophotaxis (proclivity to make U-turns so that the animal turns around 180° at intervals), phobotaxis (which prevents the organism from crossing its own and other trails) or thigmotaxis (which makes the animal to keep close contact with a former trail) have been documented in microbial matgrounds by the presence”
From Ediacaran matground ecology persisted into the earliest Cambrian (2014) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- HUA, H., PRATT, B. R., & ZHANG, L.-Y.
- Venue
- PALAIOS
- Published
- 2003
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Borings in Cloudina Shells: Complex Predator-Prey Dynamics in the Terminal Neoproterozoic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018%3C0454:bicscp%3E2.0.co;2
- The paper
- HUA, H., PRATT, B. R., & ZHANG, L.-Y. (2003). Borings in Cloudina Shells: Complex Predator-Prey Dynamics in the Terminal Neoproterozoic. PALAIOS. https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018%3C0454%3Abicscp%3E2.0.co%3B2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.