The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field-Cage Methodology for Evaluating Climatic Suitability for Introduced Wood-Borer Parasitoids: Preliminary Results from the Emerald Ash Borer System
Open accessAbstract
Field-cage methods were developed to evaluate the abilities of Tetrastichus planipennisi Yang (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Spathius agrili Yang (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), biocontrol agents of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to parasitize, develop and overwinter following three late-season releases at both a northern (Michigan) and a southern (Maryland) location within the current North American range of A. planipennis. In August, September and October of 2009, five young green ash trees were selected at each location. Tetrastichus planipennisi and S. agrili were each randomly assigned to one of two cages attached to each tree, surrounding separate sections of trunk in which late-instar A. planipennis had been inserted. The following April, the caged trunk sections were dissected to determine the fate of each A. planipennis larva and the developmental stages of all recovered parasitoid progeny. At both locations, T. planipennisi and S. agrili were able to parasitize hosts and successfully overwinter (i.e., reach adulthood the following spring). For T. planipennisi, successful parasitism (i.e., parasitoid progeny reached adulthood) occurred for all caged releases in Maryland, but only for the August and September releases in Michigan. At both locations, percent parasitism by T. planipennisi was higher in August and September than in October. For S. agrili, successful parasitism occurred for all caged releases in Maryland, but only for the August release in Michigan. In Maryland, percent parasitism by S. agrili in August and September was higher than in October. The caging method described here should be useful in determining the climatic suitability of other regions before proceeding with large-scale releases of either species and may have utility in other wood-borer parasitoid systems as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019
Kovacs, K. F., Haight, R. G., McCullough, D. G., Mercader, R. J., Siegert, N. W., & Liebhold, A. M. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.004 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005 · Cited by 782
Effect of body mass and clothing on decomposition of pig carcasses
Matuszewski, S., Konwerski, S., Frątczak, K., & Szafałowicz, M. (2014) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-014-0965-5 · Cited by 176
Potential Ecological Roles of Artemisinin Produced by Artemisia annua L.
Knudsmark Jessing, K., Duke, S. O., & Cedergreeen, N. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-014-0384-6 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Ulyshen, M. D., Duan, J. J., Bauer, L. S., Gould, J., Taylor, P., Bean, D., Holko, C., & Driesche, R. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Insect Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 141
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1536-2442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031514095
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field-Cage Methodology for Evaluating Climatic Suitability for Introduced Wood-Borer Parasitoids: Preliminary Results from the Emerald Ash Borer System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1673/031.011.14101
- The paper
- Ulyshen, M. D., Duan, J. J., Bauer, L. S., Gould, J., Taylor, P., Bean, D., Holko, C., & Driesche, R. V. (2011). Field-Cage Methodology for Evaluating Climatic Suitability for Introduced Wood-Borer Parasitoids: Preliminary Results from the Emerald Ash Borer System. Journal of Insect Science. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.14101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.