Cited by 32Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlInsect Pest Control Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intercropping for Management of Insect Pests of Castor, Ricinus communis , in the Semi—Arid Tropics of India

Open access
Srinivasa Rao, M., Rama Rao, C.A., Srinivas, K., Pratibha, G., Vidya Sekhar, S.M., Sree Vani, G., Venkateswarlu, B.·2012·Journal of Insect Science

Abstract

Intercropping is one of the important cultural practices in pest management and is based on the principle of reducing insect pests by increasing the diversity of an ecosystem. On-farm experiments were conducted in villages of semi-arid tropical (SAT) India to identify the appropriate combination of castor (Ricinus communis L.) (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae) and intercropping in relation to pest incidence. The diversity created by introducing cluster bean, cowpea, black gram, or groundnut as intercrops in castor (1:2 ratio proportions) resulted in reduction of incidence of insect pests, namely semilooper (Achaea janata L.), leaf hopper (Empoasca flavescens Fabricius), and shoot and capsule borer (Conogethes punctiferalis Guenee). A buildup of natural enemies (Microplitis, coccinellids, and spiders) of the major pests of castor was also observed in these intercropping systems and resulted in the reduction of insect pests. Further, these systems were more efficient agronomically and economically, and were thus more profitable than a castor monocrop.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1673/031.012.1401

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Mean occurrence of Microplitis on Achaea janata across various intercropping systems. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 1. Mean occurrence of Microplitis on Achaea janata across various intercropping systems. High quality figures are available online.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Impact of intercropping on castor equivalent yields and land equivalent ration (LER). High quality figures are available online.
Figure 2. Impact of intercropping on castor equivalent yields and land equivalent ration (LER). High quality figures are available online.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Impact of intercropping on gross margin from castor. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 3. Impact of intercropping on gross margin from castor. High quality figures are available online.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Rating by farmers of different castor–based intercropping systems. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 4. Rating by farmers of different castor–based intercropping systems. High quality figures are available online.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Basappa H, 2001, Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 29, 17
  2. Bureau of Economics and Statistics, 2005, Season and crop report 2004–2005.
  3. Srinivasa Rao M, 2004, Shashpa, 11, 61
  4. Subba Reddy G, 2004, Indian Journal of Agriculture Research, 38, 79
  5. Tahiliani BD, 1985, Pestology, 9, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review

    Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96

    “In addition, some articles have clearly shown how different management aspects, particularly the selection of crop species/varieties or the planting date, can affect final socio-economic results (Kuntashula et al. 2004; Srinivasa Rao et al. 2012; Sogoba et al. 2020; Severini et al. 2021).”
    Background

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Srinivasa Rao, M., Rama Rao, C. A., Srinivas, K., Pratibha, G., Vidya Sekhar, S. M., Sree Vani, G., & Venkateswarlu, B.
Affiliations
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (IN)
Venue
Journal of Insect Science
Published
2012-02
Volume
12
Issue
14
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1536-2442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996604672
Cited by
32
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Insect Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
intercropping, castor, Ricinus communis, insect pest management, semilooper, Achaea janata, leafhoppers, Empoasca flavescens, Conogethes punctiferalis, natural enemies, Microplitis, Coccinellidae, spiders, semi-arid tropics, Cyamopsis tetragonoloba, cowpea, Vigna mungo, groundnut, agroecosystem diversity, economic profitability
MeSH terms
Animals, Ricinus communis, Desert Climate, India, Insect Control, Insecta, Crops, Agricultural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review