Changes in Elk Distribution and Group Sizes after Wolf Restoration
Abstract
Changes in ungulate distribution can alter competitive interactions, plant communities, risks of zoonotic disease transmission, and availability of animals for harvest. We used annual aerial survey data for northern Yellowstone elk in Montana and Wyoming, USA to evaluate factors influencing distribution and group sizes during 1987–2009 in four sectors of elk winter range corresponding to river watersheds with different minimum elevations and snowpacks. Our best logistic regression model suggested the proportion of elk occupying the upper elevation sector decreased following wolf restoration and increased snowpack. The proportion of elk occupying the lower elevation sector increased following wolf restoration and as snowpack increased at higher elevations. Linear regression suggested group sizes increased in the lower elevation sector after wolves were restored. Concurrent demographic and movement studies suggest these changes resulted primarily from the attrition of elk from high snow areas in Yellowstone National Park due to predation, and increased survival and recruitment of elk in lower snow areas outside the Park in Montana following a substantial reduction in hunter harvest. Fitness trade-offs between foraging conditions and the risks of predation (or harvest) as constrained by snow vary considerably among elk populations in the Yellowstone ecosystem.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In northern YNP, the number of elk wintering in the park decreased recently to historically low numbers, particularly in the East sector.
“However, in northern YNP the number of elk wintering in the park actually decreased recently to historically low numbers, particularly in the East sector (Painter et al., 2015, 2018; White et al., 2012)”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as White et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- White, P. J., Proffitt, K. M., & Lemke, T. O.
- Affiliations
- Yellowstone National Park (US)
- Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US)
- Corresponding author
- White, P. J.
- ORCID
- Proffitt, Kelly M.
- Venue
- The American Midland Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Notre Dame
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-187
- ISSN
- 0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2079578447
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Midland Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- wolf reintroduction, snowpack, altitude, wintering range, ungulate movement, fitness trade-offs, predator-prey interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review