Cited by 85Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Changes in Elk Distribution and Group Sizes after Wolf Restoration

White, P. J., Proffitt, Kelly M., Lemke, Thomas O.·2012·The American Midland Naturalist

Abstract

Changes in ungulate distribution can alter competitive interactions, plant communities, risks of zoonotic disease transmission, and availability of animals for harvest. We used annual aerial survey data for northern Yellowstone elk in Montana and Wyoming, USA to evaluate factors influencing distribution and group sizes during 1987–2009 in four sectors of elk winter range corresponding to river watersheds with different minimum elevations and snowpacks. Our best logistic regression model suggested the proportion of elk occupying the upper elevation sector decreased following wolf restoration and increased snowpack. The proportion of elk occupying the lower elevation sector increased following wolf restoration and as snowpack increased at higher elevations. Linear regression suggested group sizes increased in the lower elevation sector after wolves were restored. Concurrent demographic and movement studies suggest these changes resulted primarily from the attrition of elk from high snow areas in Yellowstone National Park due to predation, and increased survival and recruitment of elk in lower snow areas outside the Park in Montana following a substantial reduction in hunter harvest. Fitness trade-offs between foraging conditions and the risks of predation (or harvest) as constrained by snow vary considerably among elk populations in the Yellowstone ecosystem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1674/0003-0031-167.1.174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In northern YNP, the number of elk wintering in the park decreased recently to historically low numbers, particularly in the East sector.

    “However, in northern YNP the number of elk wintering in the park actually decreased recently to historically low numbers, particularly in the East sector (Painter et al., 2015, 2018; White et al., 2012)”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as White et al., 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 85

Authors
White, P. J., Proffitt, K. M., & Lemke, T. O.
Affiliations
  • Yellowstone National Park (US)
  • Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US)
Corresponding author
White, P. J.
Venue
The American Midland Naturalist
Published
2012-01
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
174-187
ISSN
  • 0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4238
OpenAlex
W2079578447
Cited by
85
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Midland Naturalist (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
wolf reintroduction, snowpack, altitude, wintering range, ungulate movement, fitness trade-offs, predator-prey interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review