The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters
Abstract
As incidence data on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) have so far only been retrospectively obtained and based on inhomogeneous material, we conducted a prospective study in Austria collecting all newly diagnosed GEP-NETs during 1 year. Using the current WHO classification, the tumor, nodes, metastases (TNM) staging and Ki67 grading and the standard diagnostic procedure proposed by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), GEP-NETs from 285 patients (male: 148; female: 137) were recorded. The annual incidence rates were 2.51 per 100 000 inhabitants for men, 2.36 per 100 000 for women. The stomach (23%) was the main site, followed by appendix (21%), small intestine (15%) and rectum (14%). Patients with appendiceal tumours were significantly younger than patients with tumours in any other site. About 46.0% were classified as benign, 15.4% as uncertain, 31.9% as well differentiated malignant and 6.7% as poorly differentiated malignant. Patients with benign or uncertain tumours were significantly younger than patients with malignant tumours. Among the malignant tumours of the digestive tract, 1.49% arose from neuroendocrine cells. For malignant gastrointestinal NETs, the incidence was 0.80 per 100 000: 40.9% were ENETS stage I, 23.8% stage II, 11.6% stage III and 23.8% stage IV. The majority (59.7%) were grade 1, 31.2% grade 2 and 9.1% grade 3. NETs of the digestive tract are more common than previously reported; the majority show benign behaviour, are located in the stomach and are well differentiated. G3 tumours are very rare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Jejunum and Ileum
Niederle, B., Pape, U.-F., Costa, F., Gross, D., Kelestimur, F., Knigge, U., Öberg, K., Pavel, M., Perren, A., Toumpanakis, C., et al. (2016) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000443170 · Cited by 474
Self-citationENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms
Delle Fave, G., Kwekkeboom, D. J., Van Cutsem, E., Rindi, G., Kos-Kudla, B., Knigge, U., Sasano, H., Tomassetti, P., Salazar, R., & Ruszniewski, P. (2012) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000335595 · Cited by 327
Schiller, L. R., Pardi, D. S., Spiller, R., Semrad, C. E., Surawicz, C. M., Giannella, R. A., Krejs, G. J., Farthing, M. J. G., & Sellin, J. H. (2014) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1111/jgh.12392 · Cited by 95
Clinical syndromes related to gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms
Boutzios, G., & Kaltsas, G. (2015) · Frontiers of hormone research · doi:10.1159/000382053 · Cited by 50
Rehfeld, J. F., Broedbaek, K., Goetze, J. P., Knigge, U., & Hilsted, L. M. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365521.2020.1759141 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Niederle, M. B., Hackl, M., Kaserer, K., & Niederle, B.
- Venue
- Endocrine-Related Cancer
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 909-918
- ISSN
- 1351-0088 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-6821
- OpenAlex
- W2080769559
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1677/erc-10-0152
- The paper
- Niederle, M. B., Hackl, M., Kaserer, K., & Niederle, B. (2010). Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. Endocrine-Related Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1677/erc-10-0152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.