Cited by 8Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesPancreatic function and diabetes

Guanethidine treatment does not block the ability of central leptin administration to decrease blood glucose concentrations in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Open access
Wang, Jinpin, Wernette, Catherine M, Judd, Robert L, Huggins, Kevin W, White, B Douglas·2008·Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Leptin, administered either into the ventricles of the brain or systemically, has been shown to normalize blood glucose concentrations in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. We hypothesized that an intact sympathetic nervous system is necessary for centrally administered leptin to normalize or attenuate high blood glucose concentrations in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Young male Wistar rats (∼50 g) were treated every other day with either s.c. guanethidine (100 mg/kg) or vehicle for 2 weeks. Rats were then implanted with an intracerebroventricular cannula directed to the lateral ventricle and made diabetic with an i.v. injection of STZ (50 mg/kg). Half of the animals in each group were given daily injections of leptin (10 μl), while the remaining animals received vehicle injections. Blood glucose concentrations were measured daily and tissue norepinephrine content was determined by high performance liquid chromatography at the end of the study. Guanethidine pretreatment did not block the ability of centrally administered leptin to decrease blood glucose concentrations in diabetic rats. This suggests that the sympathetic nervous system does not mediate the leptin-induced attenuation of high blood glucose concentrations observed in diabetic rats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/joe-08-0135

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 8

Authors
Wang, J., Wernette, C. M., Judd, R. L., Huggins, K. W., & White, B. D.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Venue
Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2008-07-03
Volume
198
Issue
3
Pages
541-548
ISSN
  • 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6805
OpenAlex
W2109084793
Cited by
8
References
21
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Auburn University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
leptin, guanethidine, streptozotocin-induced diabetes, blood glucose, intracerebroventricular administration, sympathetic nervous system, norepinephrine, diabetes mellitus, glucose homeostasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Adipose Tissue, Brown, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Guanethidine, Liver, Male, Norepinephrine, Spleen, Sympathetic Nervous System, Rats, Wistar, Adrenergic Agents, Leptin, Rats, Adipose Tissue, White

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review