The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PROLACTIN AND LUTEINIZING HORMONE LEVELS BEFORE AND AFTER PARTURITION IN RATS BEARING EITHER SINGLE OR MULTIPLE EMBRYOS
Abstract
SUMMARY: Levels of prolactin and LH were determined in serum and pituitary during the last days of pregnancy and post partum in rats bearing single and multiple embryos. In rats with a single embryo serum prolactin and LH levels were significantly lower during the last 2 days of pregnancy and post partum than in rats bearing multiple embryos. While large increases were recorded in serum prolactin and LH levels in the rats with multiple embryos between days 21 and 22 of gestation, in the group with single embryos changes occurred in LH level only. Throughout the experiment pituitary prolactin was lower in rats with a single embryo than in those with multiple embryos in spite of the sharp drop in prolactin level in the group with multiple embryos from day 21 to 22. No differences were observed in the pituitary LH levels of either group during the days preceding parturition, but in the rats with multiple embryos there was a sharp drop in LH level post partum. It seems that the reduced serum prolactin level in the rats with a single embryo was associated with inhibition of pituitary prolactin synthesis and release, whereas the decreased serum LH level resulted from impaired release but not synthesis. These results support the hypothesis of a regulatory role for the placenta in pituitary prolactin and LH synthesis and release, either by hypothalamus– pituitary stimulation, or perhaps by way of the ovaries, through regulation of ovarian steroid production.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“no evidence in the literature directly links hypogonadotropism to delayed parturition and periparturient mortality19–22.”
From Conditional loss of ERK1 and ERK2 results in abnormal placentation and delayed parturition in the mouse (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brown, J. L., Sones, J. L., Angulo, C. N., Abbott, K., Miller, A. D., Boehm, U., & Roberson, M. S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45997-0 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- NIR, I., GOLDHABER, G., HIRSCHMANN, N., & SHANI, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 1977-05-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-262
- ISSN
- 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-6805
- OpenAlex
- W2172152561
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- prolactin, luteinizing hormone, childbirth, multiple pregnancy, pituitary hormone secretion
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Labor, Obstetric, Luteinizing Hormone, Pituitary Gland, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Multiple, Prolactin, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review