Cited by 123Estrogen and related hormone effectsOvarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and Fertility

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development and validation of a new monoclonal antibody to mammalian aromatase

Open access
Turner, KJ, Macpherson, S, Millar, MR, McNeilly, AS, Williams, K, Cranfield, M, Groome, NP, Sharpe, RM, Fraser, HM, Saunders, PT·2002·Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

The biosynthesis of oestrogens from androgens is catalysed by the aromatase complex, an essential component of which is the aromatase cytochrome P450 (P450 arom) protein. Expression of a functional P450 arom is essential for normal fertility in males and females and the sequence of the protein is highly conserved. We have raised a new monoclonal antibody against a conserved peptide and validated it on fixed tissue sections of the rat, common marmoset (Callthrix jacchus) and human. The monoclonal antibody was used successfully for Western analysis and specifically reacted with a 55 kDa protein in microsomal extracts. On sections of ovaries in all three species, expression in follicles was specific to the mural granulosa cells of antral follicles and was present in corpora lutea. In the human and marmoset, staining of luteal cells was markedly heterogeneous and did not appear to vary consistently with the stage of the cycle. The intensity of immunostaining was elevated in corpora lutea from pregnant rats and following human chorionic gonadotropin rescue in the human. In the testis, the highest levels of expression were observed in the Leydig cells within the interstitium. In adult rat and marmoset, and possibly also in the human, some P450 arom was associated with the cytoplasm surrounding elongate spermatids but other germ cells were immunonegative. In conclusion, a new monoclonal antibody specific for P450 arom recognises the protein in rodent, primate and human. Its ability to work on fixed tissue sections will facilitate identification of individual cells expressing P450 arom within complex tissues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/joe.0.1720021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
Turner, K., Macpherson, S., Millar, M., McNeilly, A., Williams, K., Cranfield, M., Groome, N., Sharpe, R., Fraser, H., & Saunders, P.
Affiliations
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
172
Issue
1
Pages
21-30
ISSN
  • 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6805
OpenAlex
W2119982462
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
aromatase, monoclonal antibodies, estrogen synthesis, granulosa cells, corpus luteum, Leydig cells, spermatids, immunohistochemistry, cross-species validation, marmoset, rats, human
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibody Specificity, Aromatase, Callithrix, Corpus Luteum, Cytoplasm, Female, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Granulosa Cells, Humans, Leydig Cells, Male, Mammals, Pregnancy, Spermatids, Blotting, Western, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review