Cited by 20Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersEstrogen and related hormone effects

Sex-steroid milieu determines diabetes rescue in pttg-null mice

Open access
Fraenkel, M, Caloyeras, J, Ren, S-G, Melmed, S·2006·Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Male mice that are pttg -null develop sexually dimorphic diabetes with hypoinsulinemia secondary to reduced post-natal -cell proliferation and an inability to expand islet cell mass with aging. We therefore examined the effects of sex-steroid manipulation on diabetes development in pttg −/− male mice. Surgical gonadectomy was followed by implantation of 90-day slow-release pellets releasing 17β-estradiol (0.36 mg/pellet), placebo or dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 12.5 mg/pellet). Mean fasting blood sugars at the end of the study were 414 ± 54 mg/dl for pttg −/− controls and 371 ± 14 mg/dl for pttg −/− mice gonad-ectomized and treated with DHT compared with 124 ± 40 and 85 ± 12 mg/dl in gonadectomized pttg −/− males treated with placebo or estradiol, respectively ( P < 0.01 compared with control pttg −/− ). Gonadectomy with and without estradiol treatment did not increase the very low circulating insulin levels in pttg -null males (fasting insulin 0.44 ± 0.04 ng/ml in pttg −/− controls, 0.47 ± 0.07 and 0.4 ng/ml in pttg −/− gonadectomized males treated with placebo or estradiol, respectively). Gonadectomy increased serum adiponectin levels (4.9 ± 008 μg/ml in pttg −/− controls versus 13 ± 0.08 and 7.5 ± 0.6 μg/ml in pttg −/− gonadectomized males treated with placebo or estradiol, respectively; P < 0.001 and P < 0.05), accompanied by increased insulin sensitivity. The results show that gonadectomy delayed, and gonadectomy with additional estradiol treatment prevented, diabetes development in pttg −/− males, possibly through increased insulin sensitivity mediated by elevated serum adiponectin levels. Male-selective effects of disrupted β-cell proliferation in the absence of pttg are restored by sex-steroid effects on peripheral insulin sensitivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/joe.1.06656

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Castrated male rodents have been shown to exhibit improved glucose and insulin tolerance with reduced adiposity in some studies, and in others display worsened adiposity, WAT inflammation, and glucose tolerance.

    “By contrast, castrated male rodents have been shown to exhibit improved glucose and insulin tolerance with reduced adiposity in some studies (85, 86), and in others display worsened adiposity, WAT inflammation, and glucose tolerance (87, 88).”

    From Metabolic impact of endogenously produced estrogens by adipose tissue in females and males across the lifespan (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Results report improved insulin sensitivity after gonadectomy in pttg-null male mice, and the Discussion reports delayed diabetes and lower blood glucose. The Discussion says gonadectomy further lowered body weight, but it does not establish reduced adiposity. The worsened-outcomes clause is attached to different citations, so it is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 20

Authors
Fraenkel, M., Caloyeras, J., Ren, S.-G., & Melmed, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2006-06
Volume
189
Issue
3
Pages
519-528
ISSN
  • 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6805
OpenAlex
W2145915862
Cited by
20
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK064169, DK064169)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
sex hormones, diabetes prevention, gonadectomy, estradiol, dihydrotestosterone, islet cell proliferation, beta-cell mass, hypoinsulinemia, adiponectin, insulin sensitivity, sexual dimorphism
MeSH terms
Androgens, Animals, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Carrier Proteins, Diabetes Mellitus, Estradiol, Insulin, Male, Neoplasm Proteins, Orchiectomy, Sex Characteristics, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Dihydrotestosterone, Mice, Knockout, Leptin, Cell Proliferation, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Mice, Adiponectin, Securin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review