Cited by 156Muscle Physiology and DisordersNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Modifying muscle mass – the endocrine perspective

Open access
Solomon, A M, Bouloux, P M G·2006·Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

This review describes the major hormonal factors that determine the balance between human skeletal muscle anabolism and catabolism in health and disease, with specific reference to age-related muscle loss (sarcopenia). The molecular mechanisms associated with muscle hypertrophy are described, and the central role of the satellite cell highlighted. The biological dynamics of satellite cells, varying between states of quiescence, proliferation and differentiation are strongly influenced by local endocrine factors. The molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy are examined focussing on the causes of sarcopenia and associations with systemic medical disorders. In addition, evidence is provided that the mechanisms of atrophy and hypertrophy are unlikely to be simple opposites. Novel endocrine mechanisms underpinning mechano-transduction include IGF-I subtypes that may differentiate between endocrine and mechanical signals; their interaction with classical endocrine factors is an active area of translational research. Recently acquired knowledge on the mechanism of anabolic effects of androgens is also reviewed. The increasingly recognised role of myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle function, is described, as well as its potential as a therapeutic target. Strategies to counter age-related sarcopenia thus represent an exciting field of future investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/joe.1.06837

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 143 · Cited by 156

Authors
Solomon, A. M., & Bouloux, P. M. G.
Affiliations
The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2006-11
Volume
191
Issue
2
Pages
349-360
ISSN
  • 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6805
OpenAlex
W2022533284
Cited by
156
References
143
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
sarcopenia, skeletal muscle anabolism, muscle catabolism, muscle hypertrophy, muscle atrophy, satellite cells, insulin-like growth factor I, mechanotransduction, androgens, myostatin, age-related muscle loss
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Aged, Aging, Androgens, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Hormones, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Atrophy, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Muscle, Skeletal, Myostatin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review