The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Crossrail Systems Integration – Lessons Learned and Good Practice in Managing Interdisciplinary Systems Integration through each Stage of the Crossrail Programme
Abstract
This paper sets out the main observations and lessons learnt about the integration of many different systems and the interdisciplinary coordination activities as taken from the Chief Engineers Group experience of the Crossrail Programme and highlights a strategy for Systems Integration that could be applied on other Mega Projects. These multiple systems and sub-systems have been brought together and proven to work together in a fully integrated way during the course of the works programme. This process of systems integration needed to be managed effectively from the earliest stages of outline Design through all the Installation and Testing stages right up to Handover. There was not sufficiently detailed information provided in the original Works Information on the requirements and responsibilities for integration activities. This information had to be developed and instructed later in the Design Phase. To achieve the ultimate goal of full integration at the point of handover of the infrastructure to the end-user it is important that a dedicated, central team is put in place at the very start of the programme with responsibility to actively manage the System Integration activities that must be carried out by the Contractors and their Designers, Manufacturers, Installers, Test and Commissioning teams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyner, D.
- Venue
- Crossrail Project
- Publisher
- ICE PublishingLondon
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Pages
- 137-144
- Cited by
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crossrail Systems Integration – Lessons Learned and Good Practice in Managing Interdisciplinary Systems Integration through each Stage of the Crossrail Programme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1680/cpidc.66502.137
- The paper
- Tyner, D. (2022). Crossrail Systems Integration – Lessons Learned and Good Practice in Managing Interdisciplinary Systems Integration through each Stage of the Crossrail Programme. Crossrail Project. https://doi.org/10.1680/cpidc.66502.137