Cited by 0Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceGeotechnical and construction materials studiesAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

Cement-stabilized recycled aggregate base course under coupled wet-dry cycles and repeated loading

Sobhan, K., Gonzalez, L., Reddy, D.V.·2015·Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development

Abstract

Long term performance is a major concern when recycled materials are incorporated in geotechnical and pavement applications. The current study evaluates the effects of combined wet-dry cycles and repeated mechanical loading on a cement-stabilized base course material made from recycled crushed concrete aggregate (80% by weight) and cement. The experimental program is divided into three phases, each consisting of mechanical loading on two types of specimens: (i) samples which were first exposed to wet and dry cycles in accordance with ASTM D559 procedure, and (ii) samples without prior exposure to wet and dry cycles. Phase I experiments involved monotonic loading tests under compression and flexure to evaluate the strength properties. In Phase II, a total of 108 cylindrical specimens were tested in cyclic compressive loading using a sinusoidal waveform up to 20, 200, 2000, 20000, 200000, and 2000000 cycles at three different stress ratios (0.5, 0.7 and 0.9). The residual compressive strengths and the accumulated plastic deformations were determined at the end of each cyclic regime. Phase III included a flexural fatigue testing program on 39 beam specimens. It was found that the specimens subjected to wet-dry cycles suffered significantly higher damage in terms of plastic deformation, loss of residual strength, and degradation of flexural fatigue strength compared to specimens not exposed to wet-dry cycles. These are important considerations in highway reconstruction projects in which recycled aggregates are considered as alternative materials for pavement foundations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1680/ecsmge.60678.vol6.526

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4

Authors
Sobhan, K., Gonzalez, L., & Reddy, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
  • Wantman Group 2   , West Palm Beach, Florida ,
Venue
Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development
Published
2015-01-01
Pages
3359-3364
OpenAlex
W7130712232
Cited by
0
References
4
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Keywords
recycled aggregate, wetting-drying cycles, cyclic loading, bending fatigue, residual compressive strength, plastic deformation, pavement foundations, highway reconstruction, long-term performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review