The Interpersonal–Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior Indicates Specific and Crucial Psychotherapeutic Targets
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social isolation is arguably the strongest and most reliable predictor of suicidal ideation, attempts, and lethal suicidal behavior among samples varying in age, nationality, and clinical severity.
“Social isolation is arguably the strongest and most reliable predictor of suicidal ideation, attempts, and lethal suicidal behavior among samples varying in age, nationality, and clinical severity (Conwell, 1997; Dervic, Brent, & Oquendo, 2008; Joiner & Van Orden, 2008; Trout, 1980).”
From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Joiner & Van Orden, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Joiner, T. E., & Van Orden, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- ORCID
- Joiner, Thomas E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-89
- ISSN
- 1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4244497740
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- suicidal behavior, suicide prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review