Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,897

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modified Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equation for Chinese Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Ma, Ying-Chun, Zuo, Li, Chen, Jiang-Hua, Luo, Qiong, Yu, Xue-Qing, Li, Ying, Xu, Jin-Sheng, Huang, Song-Min, Wang, Li-Ning, Huang, Wen, Wang, Mei, Xu, Guo-Bin, Wang, Hai-Yan·2006·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations provide a rapid method of assessing GFR in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, previous research indicated that modification of these equations is necessary for application in Chinese patients with CKD. The objective of this study was to modify MDRD equations on the basis of the data from the Chinese CKD population and compare the diagnostic performance of the modified MDRD equations with that of the original MDRD equations across CKD stages in a multicenter, cross-sectional study of GFR estimation from plasma creatinine, demographic data, and clinical characteristics. A total of 684 adult patients with CKD, from nine geographic regions of China were selected. A random sample of 454 of these patients were included in the training sample set, and the remaining 230 patients were included in the testing sample set. With the use of the dual plasma sampling (99m)Tc-DTPA plasma clearance method as a reference for GFR measurement, the original MDRD equations were modified by two methods: First, by adding a racial factor for Chinese in the original MDRD equations, and, second, by applying multiple linear regression to the training sample and modifying the coefficient that is associated with each variable in the original MDRD equations and then validating in the testing sample and comparing it with the original MDRD equations. All modified MDRD equations showed significant performance improvement in bias, precision, and accuracy compared with the original MDRD equations, and the percentage of estimated GFR that did not deviate >30% from the reference GFR was >75%. The modified MDRD equations that were based on the Chinese patients with CKD offered significant advantages in different CKD stages and could be applied in clinical practice, at least in Chinese patients with CKD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2006040368

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,897

Metadata

Authors
Ma, Y.-C., Zuo, L., Chen, J.-H., Luo, Q., Yu, X.-Q., Li, Y., Xu, J.-S., Huang, S.-M., Wang, L.-N., Huang, W., Wang, M., Xu, G.-B., & Wang, H.-Y.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2006-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
2937-2944
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145732657
Cited by
1,897
References
1
FWCI
28.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modified Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equation for Chinese Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2006040368
The paper
Ma, Y.-C., Zuo, L., Chen, J.-H., Luo, Q., Yu, X.-Q., Li, Y., Xu, J.-S., Huang, S.-M., Wang, L.-N., Huang, W., Wang, M., Xu, G.-B., & Wang, H.-Y. (2006). Modified Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equation for Chinese Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2006040368

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.