CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 385Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementNursing care and researchHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 223 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychosocial Aspects of Chronic Disease: ESRD as a Paradigmatic Illness

Cukor, Daniel, Cohen, Scott D., Peterson, Rolf A., Kimmel, Paul L.·2007·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
DOI 10.1681/asn.2007030345
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Psychosocial issues are an understudied yet important concern in the overall health of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Stress is a concomitant of chronic illness and its treatment, and may have meaningful influences on psychological and medical outcomes. This article reviews the influences of psychopathology, social support, family issues, dialysis unit culture, and socioeconomic status on patients treated with center HD. Depressive affect and decreased perception of social support have been linked with mortality in several studies of ESRD patients. Decreased marital satisfaction, disturbances in family dynamics, and lower socioeconomic status (SES) have been associated with poorer health outcomes and can affect patients' perception of social support and depressive affect. Chronically ill ESRD patients who undergo treatment with constant interaction and observation by medical staff are potentially an ideal group for evaluation of the effects of stress and psychosocial factors on outcomes in those with chronic disease, as well as an excellent patient population for intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality. These interactions between potentially modifiable psychosocial risk factors for disease and medical aspects of illness form a paradigm for the study of interventions related to adjustment to chronic illness in the ESRD population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2007030345

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 224 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 385

Related

Metadata

Authors
Cukor, D., Cohen, S. D., Peterson, R. A., & Kimmel, P. L.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
ORCID
Cohen, Scott D.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2007-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
3042-3055
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1681/asn.2007030345
OpenAlex
W2165958715
Cited by
385
References
224
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
psychosocial factors, hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease, chronic disease, stress, depression, social support, family dynamics, marital satisfaction, socioeconomic status, mortality, adaptation to chronic illness, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
Allergy and Immunology, Chronic Disease, Depression, Family Health, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Quality of Life, Social Class, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review