The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Usage Associates with Mortality among Hemodialysis Patients
Open accessAbstract
Many prescribe anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications to prevent thromboembolic events and access thrombosis in dialysis patients despite limited evidence of their efficacy in this population. This retrospective cohort study examined whether use of warfarin, clopidogrel, and/or aspirin affected survival in 41,425 incident hemodialysis patients during 5 yr of follow-up. The prescription frequencies for warfarin, clopidogrel, and aspirin were 8.3, 10.0, and 30.4%, respectively, during the first 90 d of initiating chronic hemodialysis. Compared with the 24,740 patients receiving none of these medications, Cox proportional hazards analysis suggested that exposure to these medications was associated with increased risk for mortality (warfarin hazard ratio [HR] 1.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 1.37]; clopidogrel HR 1.24 [95% CI 1.13 to 1.35]; and aspirin HR 1.06 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.11]). The increased mortality associated with warfarin or clopidogrel use remained in stratified analyses. A covariate- and propensity-adjusted time-varying analysis, which accounted for longitudinal changes in prescription, produced similar results. In addition, matching for treatment facility and attending physician revealed similar associations between prescription and mortality. We conclude that warfarin, aspirin, or clopidogrel prescription is associated with higher mortality among hemodialysis patients. Given the possibility of confounding by indication, randomized trials are needed to determine definitively the risk and benefit of these medications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs
Concato, J., Shah, N., & Horwitz, R. I. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006223422507 · Cited by 3,563
Cited by
Skanes, A. C., Healey, J. S., Cairns, J. A., Dorian, P., Gillis, A. M., McMurtry, M. S., Mitchell, L. B., Verma, A., & Nattel, S. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2012.01.021 · Cited by 494
Chan, K. E., Lazarus, J. M., Thadhani, R., & Hakim, R. M. (2009) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2009030319 · Cited by 431
Wizemann, V., Tong, L., Satayathum, S., Disney, A., Akiba, T., Fissell, R. B., Kerr, P. G., Young, E. W., & Robinson, B. M. (2010) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2009.477 · Cited by 408
Brodsky, S. V., Nadasdy, T., Rovin, B. H., Satoskar, A. A., Nadasdy, G. M., Wu, H. M., Bhatt, U. Y., & Hebert, L. A. (2011) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2011.44 · Cited by 314
Guía Clínica Española del Acceso Vascular para Hemodiálisis
Ibeas, J., Roca-Tey, R., Vallespín, J., Moreno, T., Moñux, G., Martí-Monrós, A., del Pozo, J. L., Gruss, E., Ramírez de Arellano, M., Fontseré, N., et al. (2017) · Nefrología · doi:10.1016/j.nefro.2017.11.004 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, K. E., Lazarus, J. M., Thadhani, R., & Hakim, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 872-881
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100928282
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Usage Associates with Mortality among Hemodialysis Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2008080824
- The paper
- Chan, K. E., Lazarus, J. M., Thadhani, R., & Hakim, R. M. (2009). Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Usage Associates with Mortality among Hemodialysis Patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2008080824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.