The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy
Abstract
Although pathologic classifications exist for several renal diseases, including IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and lupus nephritis, a uniform classification for diabetic nephropathy is lacking. Our aim, commissioned by the Research Committee of the Renal Pathology Society, was to develop a consensus classification combining type1 and type 2 diabetic nephropathies. Such a classification should discriminate lesions by various degrees of severity that would be easy to use internationally in clinical practice. We divide diabetic nephropathy into four hierarchical glomerular lesions with a separate evaluation for degrees of interstitial and vascular involvement. Biopsies diagnosed as diabetic nephropathy are classified as follows: Class I, glomerular basement membrane thickening: isolated glomerular basement membrane thickening and only mild, nonspecific changes by light microscopy that do not meet the criteria of classes II through IV. Class II, mesangial expansion, mild (IIa) or severe (IIb): glomeruli classified as mild or severe mesangial expansion but without nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesions) or global glomerulosclerosis in more than 50% of glomeruli. Class III, nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesions): at least one glomerulus with nodular increase in mesangial matrix (Kimmelstiel-Wilson) without changes described in class IV. Class IV, advanced diabetic glomerulosclerosis: more than 50% global glomerulosclerosis with other clinical or pathologic evidence that sclerosis is attributable to diabetic nephropathy. A good interobserver reproducibility for the four classes of DN was shown (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84) in a test of this classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetic Kidney Disease: Challenges, Progress, and Possibilities
Alicic, R. Z., Rooney, M. T., & Tuttle, K. R. (2017) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.11491116 · Cited by 2,898
Standards of care for type 2 diabetes in China
Weng, J., Ji, L., Jia, W., Lu, J., Zhou, Z., Zou, D., Zhu, D., Chen, L., Chen, L., Guo, L., et al. (2016) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2827 · Cited by 315
Lenoir, O., Jasiek, M., Hénique, C., Guyonnet, L., Hartleben, B., Bork, T., Chipont, A., Flosseau, K., Bensaada, I., Schmitt, A., et al. (2015) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1049799 · Cited by 296
Zhan, M., Usman, I. M., Sun, L., & Kanwar, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2014050457 · Cited by 288
Han, Y.-C., Tang, S.-Q., Liu, Y.-T., Li, A.-M., Zhan, M., Yang, M., Song, N., Zhang, W., Wu, X.-Q., Peng, C.-H., et al. (2021) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04184-8 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Tervaert, T. W. C., Mooyaart, A. L., Amann, K., Cohen, A. H., Cook, H. T., Drachenberg, C. B., Ferrario, F., Fogo, A. B., Haas, M., de Heer, E., Joh, K., Noël, L. H., Radhakrishnan, J., Seshan, S. V., Bajema, I. M., & Bruijn, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 556-563
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136490577
- Cited by
- 1,690
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2010010010
- The paper
- Tervaert, T. W. C., Mooyaart, A. L., Amann, K., Cohen, A. H., Cook, H. T., Drachenberg, C. B., Ferrario, F., Fogo, A. B., Haas, M., de Heer, E., Joh, K., Noël, L. H., Radhakrishnan, J., Seshan, S. V., Bajema, I. M., & Bruijn, J. A. (2010). Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2010010010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.