Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,690

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy

Tervaert, Thijs W. Cohen, Mooyaart, Antien L., Amann, Kerstin, Cohen, Arthur H., Cook, H. Terence, Drachenberg, Cinthia B., Ferrario, Franco, Fogo, Agnes B., Haas, Mark, de Heer, Emile, Joh, Kensuke, Noël, Laure H., Radhakrishnan, Jai, Seshan, Surya V., Bajema, Ingeborg M., Bruijn, Jan A.·2010·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Although pathologic classifications exist for several renal diseases, including IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and lupus nephritis, a uniform classification for diabetic nephropathy is lacking. Our aim, commissioned by the Research Committee of the Renal Pathology Society, was to develop a consensus classification combining type1 and type 2 diabetic nephropathies. Such a classification should discriminate lesions by various degrees of severity that would be easy to use internationally in clinical practice. We divide diabetic nephropathy into four hierarchical glomerular lesions with a separate evaluation for degrees of interstitial and vascular involvement. Biopsies diagnosed as diabetic nephropathy are classified as follows: Class I, glomerular basement membrane thickening: isolated glomerular basement membrane thickening and only mild, nonspecific changes by light microscopy that do not meet the criteria of classes II through IV. Class II, mesangial expansion, mild (IIa) or severe (IIb): glomeruli classified as mild or severe mesangial expansion but without nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesions) or global glomerulosclerosis in more than 50% of glomeruli. Class III, nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesions): at least one glomerulus with nodular increase in mesangial matrix (Kimmelstiel-Wilson) without changes described in class IV. Class IV, advanced diabetic glomerulosclerosis: more than 50% global glomerulosclerosis with other clinical or pathologic evidence that sclerosis is attributable to diabetic nephropathy. A good interobserver reproducibility for the four classes of DN was shown (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84) in a test of this classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2010010010

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,690

Metadata

Authors
Tervaert, T. W. C., Mooyaart, A. L., Amann, K., Cohen, A. H., Cook, H. T., Drachenberg, C. B., Ferrario, F., Fogo, A. B., Haas, M., de Heer, E., Joh, K., Noël, L. H., Radhakrishnan, J., Seshan, S. V., Bajema, I. M., & Bruijn, J. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
556-563
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136490577
Cited by
1,690
References
0
FWCI
27.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2010010010
The paper
Tervaert, T. W. C., Mooyaart, A. L., Amann, K., Cohen, A. H., Cook, H. T., Drachenberg, C. B., Ferrario, F., Fogo, A. B., Haas, M., de Heer, E., Joh, K., Noël, L. H., Radhakrishnan, J., Seshan, S. V., Bajema, I. M., & Bruijn, J. A. (2010). Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2010010010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.