Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rituximab Versus Cyclophosphamide for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis with Renal Involvement

Open access
Geetha, Duvuru, Specks, Ulrich, Stone, John H., Merkel, Peter A., Seo, Philip, Spiera, Robert, Langford, Carol A., Hoffman, Gary S., Kallenberg, Cees G.M., St. Clair, E. William, Fessler, Barri J., Ding, Linna, Tchao, Nadia K., Ikle, David, Jepson, Brett, Brunetta, Paul, Fervenza, Fernando C.·2015·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Rituximab (RTX) is non-inferior to cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) for remission-induction in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), but renal outcomes are unknown. This is a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the Rituximab for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) Trial who had renal involvement (biopsy proven pauci-immune GN, red blood cell casts in the urine, and/or a rise in serum creatinine concentration attributed to vasculitis). Remission-induction regimens were RTX at 375 mg/m(2) × 4 or CYC at 2 mg/kg/d. CYC was replaced by AZA (2 mg/kg/d) after 3-6 months. Both groups received glucocorticoids. Complete remission (CR) was defined as Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score/Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG)=0 off prednisone. Fifty-two percent (102 of 197) of the patients had renal involvement at entry. Of these patients, 51 were randomized to RTX, and 51 to CYC/AZA. Mean eGFR was lower in the RTX group (41 versus 50 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P=0.05); 61% and 75% of patients treated with RTX and 63% and 76% of patients treated with CYC/AZA achieved CR by 6 and 18 months, respectively. No differences in remission rates or increases in eGFR at 18 months were evident when analysis was stratified by ANCA type, AAV diagnosis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis versus microscopic polyangiitis), or new diagnosis (versus relapsing disease) at entry. There were no differences between treatment groups in relapses at 6, 12, or 18 months. No differences in adverse events were observed. In conclusion, patients with AAV and renal involvement respond similarly to remission induction with RTX plus glucocorticoids or CYC plus glucocorticoids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2014010046

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Geetha, D., Specks, U., Stone, J. H., Merkel, P. A., Seo, P., Spiera, R., Langford, C. A., Hoffman, G. S., Kallenberg, C. G. M., St. Clair, E. W., Fessler, B. J., Ding, L., Tchao, N. K., Ikle, D., Jepson, B., Brunetta, P., & Fervenza, F. C.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2015-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
976-985
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163003110
Cited by
178
References
2
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rituximab Versus Cyclophosphamide for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis with Renal Involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2014010046
The paper
Geetha, D., Specks, U., Stone, J. H., Merkel, P. A., Seo, P., Spiera, R., Langford, C. A., Hoffman, G. S., Kallenberg, C. G. M., St. Clair, E. W., Fessler, B. J., Ding, L., Tchao, N. K., Ikle, D., Jepson, B., Brunetta, P., & Fervenza, F. C. (2015). Rituximab Versus Cyclophosphamide for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis with Renal Involvement. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2014010046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.