Hyperkalemia risk with finerenone: results from the FIDELIO-DKD Trial
Open accessAbstract
Significance Statement: Hyperkalemia is common after treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). In the FIDELIO-DKD randomized trial, the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone improved cardiorenal outcomes, but was associated with a twofold higher risk of hyperkalemia versus placebo, consistent across patient subgroups. Short-term increases in serum potassium and decreases in eGFR with finerenone or placebo were associated with subsequent hyperkalemia; at month 4, the magnitude of the increased hyperkalemia risk for any given change from baseline was smaller with finerenone than with placebo. Routine potassium monitoring, with temporary treatment interruption and dose reduction in the event of hyperkalemia, is necessary for the safe use of finerenone to protect the kidneys and cardiovascular system of patients with CKD and T2D. Background: Finerenone reduced risk of cardiorenal outcomes in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes in the FIDELIO-DKD trial. We report incidences and risk factors for hyperkalemia with finerenone and placebo in FIDELIO-DKD. Methods: This post hoc safety analysis defined hyperkalemia as ≥mild or ≥moderate based on serum potassium concentrations of >5.5 or >6.0 mmol/L, respectively, assessed at all regular visits. Cumulative incidences of hyperkalemia were based on the Aalen–Johansen estimator using death as competing risk. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified significant independent predictors of hyperkalemia. Restricted cubic splines assessed relationships between short-term post-baseline changes in serum potassium or eGFR and subsequent hyperkalemia risk. During the study, serum potassium levels guided drug dosing. Patients in either group who experienced ≥mild hyperkalemia had the study drug withheld until serum potassium was ≤5.0 mmol/L; then the drug was restarted at the 10 mg daily dose. Placebo-treated patients underwent sham treatment interruption and downtitration. Results: Over 2.6 years’ median follow-up, 597 of 2785 (21.4%) and 256 of 2775 (9.2%) patients treated with finerenone and placebo, respectively, experienced treatment-emergent ≥mild hyperkalemia; 126 of 2802 (4.5%) and 38 of 2796 (1.4%) patients, respectively, experienced moderate hyperkalemia. Independent risk factors for ≥mild hyperkalemia were higher serum potassium, lower eGFR, increased urine albumin-creatinine ratio, younger age, female sex, β -blocker use, and finerenone assignment. Diuretic or sodium-glucose cotransporter–2 inhibitor use reduced risk. In both groups, short-term increases in serum potassium and decreases in eGFR were associated with subsequent hyperkalemia. At month 4, the magnitude of increased hyperkalemia risk for any change from baseline was smaller with finerenone than with placebo. Conclusions: Finerenone was independently associated with hyperkalemia. However, routine potassium monitoring and hyperkalemia management strategies employed in FIDELIO-DKD minimized the impact of hyperkalemia, providing a basis for clinical use of finerenone.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The overall frequencies of adverse events between finerenone and placebo were similar.
“While the overall frequencies of adverse events between fi nerenone and placebo were similar,”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [163]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says hyperkalemia was the only adverse event or serious adverse event with excess cases in the finerenone group, supporting broad similarity for other events. It does not report a comparison of the overall frequencies of all adverse events, and the Results report more hyperkalemia-related adverse events with finerenone (18.3%) than placebo (9.0%). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHyperkalemia-related discontinuation of study drug occurred in 2.3% among those on finerenone versus 0.9% in the placebo group.
“hyperkalemia-related discontinuation of study drug occurred in 2.3% among those on fi nerenone (vs. 0.9% in the placebo group).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [163]
The risk of hyperkalemia was significantly reduced by the presence of an SGLT2i.
“Moreover, the risk of hyperkalemia was significantly reduced by the presence of an SGLT2i (89).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 262
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- [2]Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, et al. ; Collaborative Study Group : Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345: 851–860, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3]Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes: KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Available at: https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KDIGO_2012_CKD_GL.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2021 [Google Scholar]
- [5]Fried LF, Emanuele N, Zhang JH, Brophy M, Conner TA, Duckworth W, et al. ; VA NEPHRON-D Investigators : Combined angiotensin inhibition for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 369: 1892–1903, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]Imai E, Chan JC, Ito S, Yamasaki T, Kobayashi F, Haneda M, et al. ; ORIENT Study Investigators : Effects of olmesartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes with overt nephropathy: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Diabetologia 54: 2978–2986, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8]Terker AS, Ellison DH: Renal mineralocorticoid receptor and electrolyte homeostasis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 309: R1068–R1070, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11]Agarwal R, Kolkhof P, Bakris G, Bauersachs J, Haller H, Wada T, et al. : Steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in cardiorenal medicine. Eur Heart J 42: 152–161, 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13]Kovesdy CP, Matsushita K, Sang Y, Brunskill NJ, Carrero JJ, Chodick G, et al. ; CKD Prognosis Consortium : Serum potassium and adverse outcomes across the range of kidney function: a CKD Prognosis Consortium meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 39: 1535–1542, 2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14]Vardeny O, Claggett B, Anand I, Rossignol P, Desai AS, Zannad F, et al. ; Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) Investigators : Incidence, predictors, and outcomes related to hypo- and hyperkalemia in patients with severe heart failure treated with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Circ Heart Fail 7: 573–579, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15]Desai AS, Liu J, Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Fleg J, Lewis EF, et al. : Incident hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, and clinical outcomes during spironolactone treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: analysis of the TOPCAT trial. J Card Fail 24: 313–320, 2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16]Palmer BF, Clegg DJ: Hyperkalemia across the continuum of kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 155–157, 2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17]Bolignano D, Palmer SC, Navaneethan SD, Strippoli GFM: Aldosterone antagonists for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD007004, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18]Gardiner P, Schrode K, Quinlan D, Martin BK, Boreham DR, Rogers MS, et al. : Spironolactone metabolism: steady-state serum levels of the sulfur-containing metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol 29: 342–347, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19]Agarwal R, Rossignol P, Romero A, Garza D, Mayo MR, Warren S, et al. : Patiromer versus placebo to enable spironolactone use in patients with resistant hypertension and chronic kidney disease (AMBER): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 394: 1540–1550, 2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20]Pitt B, Kober L, Ponikowski P, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Krum H, et al. : Safety and tolerability of the novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist BAY 94-8862 in patients with chronic heart failure and mild or moderate chronic kidney disease: a randomized, double-blind trial. Eur Heart J 34: 2453–2463, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21]Heinig R, Kimmeskamp-Kirschbaum N, Halabi A, Lentini S: Pharmacokinetics of the novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone (BAY 94-8862) in individuals with renal impairment. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 5: 488–501, 2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22]Arai K, Homma T, Morikawa Y, Ubukata N, Tsuruoka H, Aoki K, et al. : Pharmacological profile of CS-3150, a novel, highly potent and selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 761: 226–234, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23]Ito S, Kashihara N, Shikata K, Nangaku M, Wada T, Okuda Y, et al. : Esaxerenone (CS-3150) in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria (ESAX-DN): Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1715–1727, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24]Kario K, Ito S, Itoh H, Rakugi H, Okuda Y, Yoshimura M, et al. : Effect of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, esaxerenone, on nocturnal hypertension: a post hoc analysis of the ESAX-HTN study. Am J Hypertens 34: 540–551, 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25]Ferreira JP, Abreu P, McMurray JJV, van Veldhuisen DJ, Swedberg K, Pocock SJ, et al. : Renal function stratified dose comparisons of eplerenone versus placebo in the EMPHASIS-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 21: 345–351, 2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26]Vukadinović D, Lavall D, Vukadinović AN, Pitt B, Wagenpfeil S, Böhm M: True rate of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists-related hyperkalemia in placebo-controlled trials: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 188: 99–108, 2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28]Linde C, Bakhai A, Furuland H, Evans M, McEwan P, Ayoubkhani D, et al. : Real-world associations of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor dose, hyperkalemia, and adverse clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with new-onset chronic kidney disease or heart failure in the United Kingdom. J Am Heart Assoc 8: e012655, 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29]Hollander-Rodriguez JC, Calvert JF Jr: Hyperkalemia. Am Fam Physician 73: 283–290, 2006 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30]Kovesdy CP: Management of hyperkalaemia in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 10: 653–662, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Agarwal, R., Joseph, A., Anker, S. D., Filippatos, G., Rossing, P., Ruilope, L. M., Pitt, B., Kolkhof, P., Scott, C., Lawatscheck, R., Wilson, D. J., Bakris, G. L., & on behalf of the FIDELIO-DKD Investigators
- Affiliations
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Bayer (Germany) (DE)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Bayer (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Bayer (United States) (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agarwal, Rajiv
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 225-237
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-3450
- PMC
- PMC8763180
- OpenAlex
- W3211312223
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 40
- FWCI
- 22.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bayer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Potassium and Related Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
- Keywords
- hyperkalemia, finerenone, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, serum potassium, estimated glomerular filtration rate, risk factors, drug safety, potassium monitoring, dose reduction, cardiorenal outcomes, Aalen-Johansen estimator
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hyperkalemia, Male, Middle Aged, Naphthyridines, Potassium, Risk Factors, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review