The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Experimental Diabetes Mellitus: Potential Role of Tubular Reabsorption
Abstract
Abstract.: An increase in Na+/glucose cotransport upstream to the macula densa might contribute to the increase in single nephron GFR (SNGFR) in early diabetes mellitus by lowering the signal of the tubuloglomerular feedback, i.e., the luminal Na+, Cl-, and K+ concentration sensed by the macula densa. To examine this issue, micropuncture experiments were performed in nephrons with superficial glomeruli of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in rats. First, in nondiabetic control rats, ambient early distal tubular concentrations of Na+, Cl-, and K+ were about 21, 20, and 1.2 mM, respectively, suggesting collection sites relatively close to the macula densa. Second, glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetic rats was associated with a reduction in ambient early distal tubular concentrations of Na+, Cl-, and K+ by 20 to 28%, reflecting an increase in fractional reabsorption of these ions up to the early distal tubule. Third, in diabetic rats, early proximal tubular application of phlorizin, an inhibitor of Na+/glucose cotransport, elicited (1) a greater reduction in absolute and fractional reabsorption of Na+, Cl-, and K+ up to the early distal tubule, and (2) a greater increase in early distal tubular concentration of these ions, which was associated with a more pronounced reduction in SNGFR. These findings support the concept that stimulation of tubular Na+/glucose cotransport by reducing the tubuloglomerular feedback signal at the macula densa may contribute to glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetic rats. Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetic rats serves to compensate for the rise in fractional tubular reabsorption to partly restore the electrolyte load to the distal nephron.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heerspink, H. J. L., Perkins, B. A., Fitchett, D. H., Husain, M., & Cherney, D. Z. I. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.021887 · Cited by 1,376
Cherney, D. Z. I., Perkins, B. A., Soleymanlou, N., Maione, M., Lai, V., Lee, A., Fagan, N. M., Woerle, H. J., Johansen, O. E., Broedl, U. C., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.113.005081 · Cited by 1,329
Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment
Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Smits, M. M., van Bommel, E. J., Heerspink, H. J. L., van Raalte, D. H., & Joles, J. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2016060666 · Cited by 887
Dapagliflozin a glucose-regulating drug with diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes
Lambers Heerspink, H. J., de Zeeuw, D., Wie, L., Leslie, B., & List, J. (2013) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.12127 · Cited by 837
Glomerular hyperfiltration: definitions, mechanisms and clinical implications
Helal, I., Fick-Brosnahan, G. M., Reed-Gitomer, B., & Schrier, R. W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2012.19 · Cited by 673
Metadata
- Authors
- VALLON, V., RICHTER, K., BLANTZ, R. C., THOMSON, S., & OSSWALD, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2569-2576
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164080605
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Experimental Diabetes Mellitus: Potential Role of Tubular Reabsorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v10122569
- The paper
- VALLON, V., RICHTER, K., BLANTZ, R. C., THOMSON, S., & OSSWALD, H. (1999). Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Experimental Diabetes Mellitus: Potential Role of Tubular Reabsorption. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v10122569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.