The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence, Predictors, and Consequences of Late Nephrology Referral at a Tertiary Care Center
Abstract
Abstract.: Despite improvements in dialysis care, mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains high. One factor that has thus far received little attention, but might contribute to morbidity and mortality, is the timing of referral to the nephrologist. This study examines the hypothesis that late referral of patients to the nephrologist might lead to suboptimal pre-ESRD care. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the patient records and electronic databases of New England Medical Center, its affiliated dialysis unit (Dialysis Clinics, Inc., Boston), and the office records of the outpatient nephrology clinic. Early (ER) and late (LR) referral were defined by the time of first nephrology encounter greater than or less than 4 mo, respectively, before initiation of dialysis. Multivariate models were built to explore factors associated with LR, and whether LR is associated with hypoalbuminemia or late initiation of dialysis. Of the 135 patients, 30 (22%) were referred late. There were no differences in age, gender, race, and cause of ESRD between ER and LR patients. However, there were significant differences in insurance coverage between these two groups. In the multivariate analysis, patients covered by health maintenance organizations were more likely to be referred late (odds ratio = 4.5) than patients covered by Medicare. Compared to ER, LR patients were more likely to have hypoalbuminemia (56% versus 80%), hematocrit <28% (33% versus 55%), and predicted GFR <5 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (17% versus 40%) at the start of dialysis, and less likely to have received erythropoietin (40% versus 17%) or have a functioning permanent vascular access for the first hemodialysis (40% versus 4%). It is concluded that late referral to the nephrologist is common in the United States and is associated with poor pre-ESRD care. Pre-ESRD care of patients treated by nephrologists was also less than ideal. The patient-, physician-, and system-related factors behind this observation are unclear. Meanwhile, pre-ESRD educational efforts need to target patients, generalists, and nephrologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: Results from the DOPPS
Pisoni, R. L., Young, E. W., Dykstra, D. M., Greenwood, R. N., Hecking, E., Gillespie, B., Wolfe, R. A., Goodkin, D. A., & Held, P. J. (2002) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00117.x · Cited by 851
Testing for chronic kidney disease: a position statement from the National Kidney Foundation
Vassalotti, J. A., Stevens, L. A., & Levey, A. S. (2007) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.06.013 · Cited by 331
Stack, A. G. (2003) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/ajkd.2003.50038 · Cited by 269
Smart, N. A., Dieberg, G., Ladhani, M., & Titus, T. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007333.pub2 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- ARORA, P., OBRADOR, G. T., RUTHAZER, R., KAUSZ, A. T., MEYER, K. B., JENULESON, C. S., & PEREIRA, B. J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1281-1286
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131246595
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence, Predictors, and Consequences of Late Nephrology Referral at a Tertiary Care Center. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v1061281
- The paper
- ARORA, P., OBRADOR, G. T., RUTHAZER, R., KAUSZ, A. T., MEYER, K. B., JENULESON, C. S., & PEREIRA, B. J. G. (1999). Prevalence, Predictors, and Consequences of Late Nephrology Referral at a Tertiary Care Center. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v1061281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.