Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Race and socioeconomic factors influencing early placement on the kidney transplant waiting list.

Kasiske, B L, London, W, Ellison, M D·1998·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

This cohort study investigates whether there are inequities in the current system for listing patients for cadaveric renal transplantation, using univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with early registration before initiation of dialysis. It includes patient registrations for the kidney and kidney-pancreas waiting lists between April 1, 1994, and June 30, 1996 (n = 41,596) from all 238 United Network for Organ Sharing renal transplant centers. Patient and center factors predicting dialysis status (pre- or postdialysis initiation) at the time of registration were examined. Independent predictors of listing before dialysis (P < 0.001) included: female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, reference: male, i.e., listing before dialysis was 14% more likely in females than in males); age < or =17 and age 18 to 55 (OR = 1.91 and 1.14, respectively, reference: age >55); prior transplant (OR = 1.80, reference: no prior transplant); 0 to 8 yr education, attended college, and received a college degree (OR = 0.78, 1.18, and 1.37, respectively, reference: high school degree); black race, Hispanic, and Asian/other (OR = 0.47, 0.59, and 0.55, reference: white); full-time employment (OR = 1.98, reference: less than full time); payment with Medicare and private insurance (OR = 0.35 and 1.24, respectively, reference: other pay); receiving insulin (OR = 1.29, reference; not on insulin); listed for kidney-pancreas (OR = 1.43, reference: listed for kidney only); listed at a center with volume >400 (OR = 1.22, reference: volume <400). To remove possible bias for general access to health care and referral for transplantation, the analysis was limited to patients who had a previous transplant and found similar results. It is concluded that racial and ethnic minorities, those less well educated, and those with fewer financial resources are less likely than their counterparts to be listed for renal transplantation before dialysis. These results suggest there may be remediable inequities in the current system for registration for renal transplantation in the United States. Education efforts directed at patients and providers, as well as recently mandated uniform listing criteria for cadaveric organ transplantation, may help to reduce these inequities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.v9112142

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Kasiske, B. L., London, W., & Ellison, M. D.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
1998-11
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
2142-2147
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110558936
Cited by
205
References
0
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race and socioeconomic factors influencing early placement on the kidney transplant waiting list. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v9112142
The paper
Kasiske, B. L., London, W., & Ellison, M. D. (1998). Race and socioeconomic factors influencing early placement on the kidney transplant waiting list. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v9112142

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.