How to distinguish seizures from non-epileptic manifestations
Open accessAbstract
The first and most important step in establishing diagnosis of epilepsy consists of careful history taking from patients and witnesses. The clinical evaluation of the event will lead the indication for further diagnostic tests including e.g. EEG and MRI. Hence, identifying the paroxysmal event as epileptic or non-epileptic is the very first step in the diagnostic process. Paroxysmal events pose a clinical challenge, as these are unpredictable and do not usually occur in the doctor's office. History taking, hunting for witness reports and home-video recordings are the main tools to conclude whether a paroxysmal event is a seizure or not. In this review, we describe the most common differential diagnoses of epileptic seizures, including syncope, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, as well as a variety of paroxysmal conditions and behaviours of all age groups. Misdiagnosis of non-epileptic events as epilepsy may not only defer the correct diagnosis and treatment but also poses additional risk by prescribing antiepileptic drugs unnecessarily. Moreover, missing the diagnosis of epilepsy implies risk of additional seizures and therefore possibly injuries, sudden death in people with epilepsy, or status epilepticus. Studies have shown that patient and witness accounts are unreliable in a high percentage of cases. Therefore, the core competency of doctors and medical professionals assessing paroxysmal events is knowledge of the clinical features that help define the different aetiologies, thus empowering them to establish the most accurate appraisal of an event. [Published with video sequences].
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings are insufficient and unsuitable for the diagnosis of an epileptic event or convulsive syncope in this case.
“findings are insufficient and unsuitable for the diagnosis of an epileptic event or convulsive syncope (55, 95, 96).”
From Combined Fainting and Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures as Significant Therapy Hurdles in Blood-Injury-Injection Phobia: A Mini-Review and Case Report (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 131 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Leibetseder, A., Eisermann, M., LaFrance, W. C., Nobili, L., & von Oertzen, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
- Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry Brown University, Providence Rhode Island USA
- Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
- Medical Faculty Johannes Kepler University Linz Austria
- Venue
- Epileptic Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 716-738
- ISSN
- 1294-9361 (ISSN-L)
- 1950-6945
- OpenAlex
- W3118847340
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Epileptic Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- epileptic seizures, non-epileptic paroxysmal events, differential diagnosis, syncope, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, eyewitness testimony, patient history taking, misdiagnosis, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, status epilepticus
- MeSH terms
- Diagnosis, Differential, Epilepsy, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Seizures, Somatoform Disorders, Syncope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review