Cited by 93Epilepsy research and treatmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeurology and Historical Studies

How to distinguish seizures from non-epileptic manifestations

Open access
Leibetseder, Annette, Eisermann, Monika, LaFrance, W. Curt, Nobili, Lino, von Oertzen, Tim J.·2020·Epileptic Disorders

Abstract

The first and most important step in establishing diagnosis of epilepsy consists of careful history taking from patients and witnesses. The clinical evaluation of the event will lead the indication for further diagnostic tests including e.g. EEG and MRI. Hence, identifying the paroxysmal event as epileptic or non-epileptic is the very first step in the diagnostic process. Paroxysmal events pose a clinical challenge, as these are unpredictable and do not usually occur in the doctor's office. History taking, hunting for witness reports and home-video recordings are the main tools to conclude whether a paroxysmal event is a seizure or not. In this review, we describe the most common differential diagnoses of epileptic seizures, including syncope, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, as well as a variety of paroxysmal conditions and behaviours of all age groups. Misdiagnosis of non-epileptic events as epilepsy may not only defer the correct diagnosis and treatment but also poses additional risk by prescribing antiepileptic drugs unnecessarily. Moreover, missing the diagnosis of epilepsy implies risk of additional seizures and therefore possibly injuries, sudden death in people with epilepsy, or status epilepticus. Studies have shown that patient and witness accounts are unreliable in a high percentage of cases. Therefore, the core competency of doctors and medical professionals assessing paroxysmal events is knowledge of the clinical features that help define the different aetiologies, thus empowering them to establish the most accurate appraisal of an event. [Published with video sequences].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1684/epd.2020.1234

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 131 · Cited by 93

Authors
Leibetseder, A., Eisermann, M., LaFrance, W. C., Nobili, L., & von Oertzen, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
  • Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry Brown University, Providence Rhode Island USA
  • Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
  • Medical Faculty Johannes Kepler University Linz Austria
Venue
Epileptic Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
716-738
ISSN
  • 1294-9361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1950-6945
OpenAlex
W3118847340
Cited by
93
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epileptic Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
epileptic seizures, non-epileptic paroxysmal events, differential diagnosis, syncope, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, eyewitness testimony, patient history taking, misdiagnosis, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, status epilepticus
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Epilepsy, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Seizures, Somatoform Disorders, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review