Cited by 1Learning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Learning profiles and academic performance of undergraduate students

Open access
Herig, Shelby A., Schuh, Kathy, Yarbrough, Donald, Ankenmann, Robert, Kelly, Mitchell, Welch, Catherine·2022

Abstract

This study investigates student learning profiles and their relationship to academic performance among undergraduate students. Seventy-one undergraduate students from a teacher education program completed a modified MED NORD. The analysis of student responses to the MED NORD distinguished two dominant learning profiles of students based upon their tendency to display more learning-promotive versus learning-inhibitive behaviors. The two profiles of students were identified as being secure (38 students) or insecure (33 students). Further analysis indicated that students in the secure learning profile group performed academically superior (higher semester GPA) to students with an insecure learning profile (lower semester GPA). An additional aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the MED NORD instrument and the Adapted Basic Needs Satisfaction Scale (ABNSS) as well as to determine if there was a relationship between the identified student learning profiles (secure and insecure) and students’ responses on the ABNSS. An analysis of the learning profiles in relation to the ABNSS found no statistical significance. Upon further investigation into the relationship between the MED NORD and the ABNSS, there were seven statistically significant correlations noted between subscales of the two instruments. Based upon an analysis of this, it is suggested that future research consider combining the MED NORD and the ABNSS into one instrument, which could be of greater benefi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17077/etd.006319

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herig, S. A., Schuh, K., Yarbrough, D., Ankenmann, R., Kelly, M., & Welch, C.
Corresponding author
Herig, Shelby A.
Published
2021-12-01
OpenAlex
W4283584356
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
learning profiles, academic performance, basic needs satisfaction, pre-service teachers, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review