The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
"Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and Joseph
Open accessAbstract
CITATION: Giffone, B. D. 2019. Israel's only son? the complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and Joseph. Old Testament Essays, 32(3):956-972, doi:10.17159/2312-3621/2019/v32n3a10.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that Genesis 35–50 uses Benjamin—the only son born to “Israel” after Jacob’s name change—to mediate competing Israelite identities between Josephites to the north and Judahites to the south. It reads the narrative’s conciliatory “All Israel” message as reflecting and shaping preexilic, Babylonian, and Persian-period communities.
Key findings
- In the received text, Benjamin is Jacob’s twelfth and youngest son and the only child born to “Israel” after Jacob’s name change in Gen 35:9–15; this evokes Israel’s origins in Benjaminite territory and the Benjaminite identity of Israel’s first king, Saul.
- Genesis 42–45 embeds a tug-of-war over Benjamin: Joseph gives him a feast portion five times larger than the other brothers’ portions (43:34) and later five changes of clothes and 300 pieces of silver (45:22), while Judah pledges himself for Benjamin’s safety (43:9) and offers himself as a slave in Benjamin’s place (44:33).
- Reuben is eclipsed by Judah and Joseph; Reuben is referenced only twice in Judges, Samuel, and Kings (Jdg 5:15–16; 2 Kgs 10:33), whereas Gileadites have two judges and thirteen references.
- Archaeological synthesis indicates the Benjaminite regions suffered little from the Babylonian invasion and show continuous settlement in the sixth century BCE; decline begins late in the sixth century, with destruction of Benjaminite towns Bethel, Gibeon, and Gibeah in the first quarter of the fifth century BCE.
Methods
- Literary and redactional close reading of Genesis 35–50, especially Gen 35, 38, 42–45, and 49, combined with historical reconstruction of Benjamin from archaeology and secondary scholarship.
- Uses a “textual identities” framework and Jonker’s multi-level identity negotiation—imperial, regional, ethnic, and cultic—to interpret the final-form narrative as intentionally shaped by “storymakers.”
- No new primary data; the analysis synthesizes biblical text, archaeological reports such as Lipschits, and prior studies.
Limitations
- Stated: the transmission history of the traditions remains opaque; there is no consensus on how and why the Pentateuch was shaped; multiple “final forms” exist, including Samaritan and Greek textual traditions; and the presumption of conscious final-form intentionality is not universally held.
- Evident: the argument is interpretive and depends on secondary archaeological synthesis rather than new fieldwork or quantitative analysis; conclusions about embedded tribal identities cannot be directly falsified from the text.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Own interpretation · 12 Own result · 10 Sources not found · 6 Not checked yet · 4 No basis given
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The biblical narratives do portray the borders of Benjaminite territory as shifting over time.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, starting late in the sixth century Benjamin appears to have experienced decline.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The land that became identified with Benjamin seems to have been home to a great number of important cultic sites”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In later Israel's story, we see Reuben eclipsed as firstborn in Israel by Judah (Jdg 1:2; 20:18).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Reuben Eclipsed by Judah and Joseph
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Jdg 1:2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Jdg 20:18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Benjamin appears to have played a key role as the border tribe between the Northern and Southern Kingdoms after the North's secession.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Benjaminite identity continued to be relevant to the self-understanding of many Jews in Palestine and the Diaspora well into the Hellenistic period.25”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, whatever inclusive visions of Israelite reunification there may be in the prophetic texts, we should understand these inclusive messages as directed toward Benjaminites in practice.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This sort of addition and shaping of a Northern-oriented narrative in a pro-Judah direction is just the sort of activity that, I would argue, may be observed in Judges and Samuel.43”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 2 Development of Judah's Character
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Boling
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Butler
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Webb
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But fate (or Providence) determined that Benjamin would come under the wing of Judah's protection to the south.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, like each of the books of the Deuteronomistic History, Genesis 35-50 appears to contain layers of Northern Israelite/Josephite, Benjaminite, and Judahite traditions.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 22
- Probably not a substantial claim. 40
In the paper
“Benjaminites were among the returnees, and some she'erit Yehudians apparently joined with the golah community and associated with the Jerusalem cult (Ezr 6:21).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ezr 6:21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, neither the loss of deportees under Babylonian rule nor the subsequent waves of returnees under early Persian rule appears to have had significant impact on the population of the Benjaminite region.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This contrasts with the portrayal of Benjamin in the Chronicler's main source, the Deuteronomistic History, which puts on display the varied, messy history between Benjamin and Judah.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, it is highly significant that the biblical text describes the first king of Israel, Saul, as a Benjaminite.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the postexilic period, the regions of Judah and Benjamin appear to have constituted a single polity within the Persian Empire: Yehud Province.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Chronicler's perspective on Israel's story is pro-Levi and pro-Judah; yet he goes to great lengths to present Benjamin in a positive light as well.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though portions of the land of Benjamin were part of the Northern Kingdom-notably Bethel 17most of Benjamin was part of the kingdom of Judah during the divided monarchy.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The language of the oracles to Solomon and Jeroboam (1 Kgs 11:11-13; 11:29-39) leaves Benjamin's affiliation ambiguous: ten 14 tribes (vv.31, 35) are torn from David's line, and only one is left for David (vv.13, 32, 36).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The additions do not whitewash Judah's character, nor do they completely obscure the positive role of Joseph.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 2 Development of Judah's Character
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Judah is instrumental in reuniting Joseph with Benjamin and later with Jacob as well (46:28).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When Benjamin finally comes with the nine brothers, Joseph gives Benjamin a feast portion from his own table-a portion five times larger than the portions given to the other brothers (43:34).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Reuben is also eclipsed as a Transjordan tribe by half-Manasseh (i.e., Gilead): Gileadites have two judges (Jair and Jephthah) and thirteen references in Samuel and Kings-whereas Reuben is only referenced twice in all of Judges, Samuel and Kings (Jdg 5:15-16; 2 Kgs 10:33).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Reuben Eclipsed by Judah and Joseph
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Jdg 5:15-16
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 2 Kgs 10:33
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both brothers speak words that endanger Benjamin's life, and both brothers offer Benjamin protection.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The character of Benjamin in Genesis 35-50 is entirely silent and passive-and yet he becomes a significant object not only to his father but to his brothers around him.45”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet in the middle of the story, Joseph endangers Benjamin's life by placing his divination cup in Benjamin's grain sack (44:1-2, 5).”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“However, in the middle of the story Judah along with the brothers (he is not named specifically) makes an ignorant vow that endangers Benjamin's life.46”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schnittjer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These layers may be seen in the peculiar interests of certain passages in tribal ancestors or locations.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“White points out the connections haphazard 44 : the larger narrative of Jacob's sons does indeed cohere as a whole.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites White
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet numerous narrative and linguistic similarities connect Genesis 38 to the preceding and succeeding chapters.40”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 2 Development of Judah's Character
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Benjamin is Jacob's twelfth and youngest son, and the younger son of Rachel, the favoured wife, who dies giving birth to Benjamin.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 1 Genesis 35
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Genesis 35 and 42-45 in particular, the silent character Benjamin finds himself in the middle of a tug-of-war between his brothers, particularly his full-brother Joseph and his half-brother Judah.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“In Genesis 35 and 42-45 in particular, the silent character Benjamin finds himself in the middle of a tug-of-war between his brothers, particularly his full-brother Joseph and his half-brother Judah.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Abstract
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Benjaminites retained their separate tribal identity-as did the Levites.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the beginning of the period of divided monarchy the land of Benjamin was divided, torn between stronger ties to the north and southern kings attempting to create a buffer for their capitals.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Between Josephites to the north and Judahites to the south, Benjaminites preserved a unique identity within the polities of Israel, Judah, Babylonian Yehud, and Persian Yehud.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“Between Josephites to the north and Judahites to the south, Benjaminites preserved a unique identity within the polities of united Israel, Judah, Babylonian Yehud, and Persian Yehud.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Chronicler, recognizing that the floundering second temple in marginalized Jerusalem (within the Persian Empire) needed the support of more successful Benjaminite areas to the north, crafts a narrative to argue that All Israel should worship at Jebus/Jerusalem (on the border between Benjamin and Judah), and that Benjamin and Judah had early and always enjoyed close ties.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The biblical texts, when properly interpreted as ideological portrayals of the Babylonian and Persian eras, indicate that at least some of the prosperous she'erit community of early Yehud were Benjaminites, who were influential in provincial government and came into conflict with the returnees.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Archaeologists, while hesitating to ascribe definitively a name to the first king of Israel, mostly agree that given the location of Israel's emergence, a Benjaminite king is plausible.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > B HISTORY OF THE TRIBE OF BENJAMIN 4
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The conciliatory message of the narrative of Genesis 35-50 for later communities comes into sharper focus when we see the compromise between tribal identities embedded in the text.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Abstract
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In a recent monograph, I have argued that the book of Chronicles is a form of consensus-building literature.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This paper suggests that the received text of Genesis 35-50 both reflects and illumines the complexities of Israelite identity in the preexilic, Babylonian, and Persian periods.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Abstract
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The final form of the text is the product of some conscious intention by an individual or a group of individuals who presented the text in [something close to] its present form to the community for retention, reverence, and reproduction.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Hebrew Bible in its final form bears the mark of pro-Judah editors and redactors.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 2 Development of Judah's Character
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is this balancing and gradual shaping that we find in Genesis 35-50.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > C MULTI-LEVELLED, TEXTUAL IDENTITIES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Most biblical texts, including Genesis, are composite works containing traditions that predate the final form of the text by many centuries.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The final form of the text is the product of some conscious intention by an individual or a group of individuals who presented the text in [something close to] its present form to the community for retention, reverence, and reproduction.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Benjaminites seem to have always perceived close ethnic ties to their Josephite neighbours to the north.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the complexity of the legacy of Israelite tribal identity, it makes perfect sense that the biblical texts edited and compiled during this period would have a blend of traditions from Northern, Benjaminite, Judahite and Levite communities.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > C MULTI-LEVELLED, TEXTUAL IDENTITIES
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It offers us a window into Judahite perceptions of Judah-Benjamin relations.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The well-known and beloved story of Joseph and his brothers in the last third of Genesis is indeed a story about forgiveness and reconciliation.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Benjaminite territories, as we have seen, were the heart of the emerging and united Israel.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While Joseph's choice to forgive remains the dominant thread in the narrative, his choice is a response to Judah's courage in protecting Benjamin.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This political question is embedded Genesis 42-45: With whom does Benjamin belong?”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, there are enough parallels to later Israelite history to justify seeing intertribal relations in the identities embedded within the narrative.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Far from being edited haphazardly, we have seen that the tribal history embedded within the text actually lends coherence by explaining the inclusion of such traditions as Genesis 38 in the final form.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key moments in the story that lead to that resolution all relate to Benjamin.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the transmission history of these traditions remains opaque, we may affirm with reasonable confidence that the old stories were shaped so as to ensure their continuing relevance for the communities in which they were finalized.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Additional information
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Competing tendencies are reflected in these texts: on the one hand, the ideologies and rhetorical goals of the authors (including the survival of the community), and on the other hand, the parameters created by community memory and tradition.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > C MULTI-LEVELLED, TEXTUAL IDENTITIES
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genesis 42-45 presents a comparison between Judah and Joseph, and the measure of fraternal loyalty is each brother's treatment of Benjamin.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The book of Chronicles, which appears to be derived in part from some version of Samuel-Kings, is a notable and instructive exception.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Returning to the Genesis narrative, Reuben is similarly eclipsed at every turn by Joseph or Judah.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Reuben Eclipsed by Judah and Joseph
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Later, Benjamin was at the centre of a tug-of-war between Judah and the Northern coalition led by Manasseh and Ephraim.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 3 Benjamin: Silent and Passive between Judah and Joseph
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But even as Joseph is brought on a journey of suffering and forgiveness, Judah is transformed from a man who would sell his own brother into slavery (or even kill his brother) into a man who would risk his life to save a brother: first Simeon, a full brother, and then Benjamin, a half-brother.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 2 Development of Judah's Character
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we will see, these two brothers struggle for primacy in the story and control over Benjamin-while Reuben, like the tribe that would bear his name, is left in the dust.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > Reuben Eclipsed by Judah and Joseph
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This encounter with Tamar may be considered a turning point in Judah's life; he tricked his trickster father, but now his daughter-in-law has turned the tables on him.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > 2 Development of Judah's Character
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yehud's imperial context placed a certain pressure on the scribal communities to retain the distinct voices of Israel's tribes within a work such as the Pentateuch, while being careful not to be so distinct as to undermine social cohesion.”
§ "Israel's" Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and > C MULTI-LEVELLED, TEXTUAL IDENTITIES
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Most biblical texts, including Genesis, are composite works containing traditions that predate the final form of the text by many centuries.
“First, most biblical texts, including Genesis, are composite works containing traditions that predate the final form of the text by many centuries.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The final form of the text is the product of some conscious intention by an individual or a group of individuals who presented the text in [something close to] its present form to the community for retention, reverence, and reproduction.
“I presume that the final form of the text is the product of some conscious intention by an individual or a group of individuals who presented the text in [something close to] its present form to the community for retention, reverence, and reproduction.”
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, V. P. (1990) · Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. eBooks · doi:10.5040/bci-0092 · Cited by 216
The Legacy of Israel in Judah's Bible
Fleming, D. Ε. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139163033 · Cited by 167
A Study of the Biblical Story of Joseph (Genesis 37-50)
Redford (1970) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004275430 · Cited by 73
A Study of the Biblical Story of Joseph (Genesis 37-50)
Andersen, F. I., & Redford, D. B. (1975) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3265740 · Cited by 51
Saul, Benjamin and the Emergence of ›Biblical Israel‹ (Part 1)
Na'aman, N. (2009) · Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft · doi:10.1515/zaw.2009.014 · Cited by 41
Defining All-Israel in Chronicles
Jonker, L. (2016) · Mohr Siebeck eBooks · doi:10.1628/978-3-16-154596-2 · Cited by 40
Joseph, Judah and the Benjamin Conundrum
Levin, Y. (2004) · Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft · doi:10.1515/zatw.2004.011 · Cited by 33
The History of the Benjamin Region under Babylonian Rule
Lipschits, O. (1999) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1179/tav.1999.1999.2.155 · Cited by 27
The Youngest Son or Where Does Genesis 38 Belong
Goldin, J. (1977) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3265325 · Cited by 18
Texts, Contexts and Readings in Postexilic Literature
Jonker, L. (2011) · Mohr Siebeck eBooks · doi:10.1628/978-3-16-151852-2 · Cited by 15
Davies, P. R. (2007) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/ej.9789004145122.i-577.58 · Cited by 14
Oredsson, D. (1997) · Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok · Cited by 8
Albertz, R. (2008) · Gorgias Press eBooks · doi:10.31826/9781463216238-005 · Cited by 3
“Special Forces”: A Stereotype of Benjaminite Soldiers in the Deuteronomistic History and Chronicles
Giffone, B. D. (2016) · Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament · doi:10.1080/09018328.2016.1122287 · Cited by 2
Self-citationJonker, L. (2013) · Chronicling the Chronicler · doi:10.1515/9781575068725-008
Bethel: The Israelite Impact on Judean Language and Literature
Knauf, E. A. (2006) · Judah and the Judeans in the Persian Period · doi:10.1515/9781575065618-015
The History of the Benjamin Region under Babylonian Rule
Lipschits, O. (1999) · Tel Aviv: Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University · doi:10.1179/033443599788145674
Benjamin Traditions Read in the Early Persian Period
Blenkinsopp, J. (2006) · Judah and the Judeans in the Persian Period · doi:10.1515/9781575065618-026
Chronicles as Consensus Literature
Glatt-Gilad, D. A. (2011) · What Was Authoritative for Chronicles? · doi:10.1515/9781575066561-005
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Amit, Yairah. "The Delicate Balance in the Image of Saul and Its Place in the Deuteronomistic History." Pages 71-79 in Saul in Story and Tradition. Edited by
- Brueggemann, Walter. Genesis: A Commentary for Teaching and Preaching. Interpretation series. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982.
- Cohen, Shaye J. D. The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999.
- Faust, Avraham. "Settlement Patterns and State Formation in Southern Samaria and the Archaeology of (a) Saul." Pages 14-38 in Saul in Story and Tradition. Edited by
- Giffone, Benjamin D. 'Sit at My Right Hand': The Chronicler's Portrait of the Tribe of Benjamin in the Social Context of Yehud. LHBOTS 628. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016.
- Knoppers, Gary N. "Israel's First King and 'The Kingdom of YHWH in the Hands of the Sons of David': The Place of the Saulide Monarchy in the Chronicler's Historiography." Pages 187-213 in Saul in Story and Tradition. Edited by Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White. FAT 47. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006.
- Kreuzer, Siegfried. "Saul-Not Always-at War: A New Perspective on the Rise of Kingship in Israel." Pages 39-58 in Saul in Story and Tradition. Edited by Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White. FAT 47. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006.
- Mobley, Gregory. "Glimpses of the Heroic Saul." Pages 80-87 in Saul in Story and Tradition. Edited by Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White. FAT 47. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006.
- Schunck, Klaus-Dietrich. "Benjamin." Translated by Phillip R. Callaway. Pages 671- 673 in Anchor Bible Dictionary, vol.
- White, Marsha C. "Saul and Jonathan in 1 Samuel 1 and 14." Pages 119-138 in Saul in Story and Tradition. Edited by Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White. FAT 47. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dziadosz, D. A. (2025) · Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia · doi:10.12775/bpth.2025.008 · Cited by 1
Benjaminite memories in 1 Samuel: Scribal memory and the contest of identities in Persian Yehud
Kwon, J. J. (2026) · Journal for the Study of the Old Testament · doi:10.1177/03090892251413605
Metadata
- Authors
- Giffone, B. D.
- Affiliations
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Giffone, Benjamin D.
- ORCID
- Giffone, Benjamin D.
- Venue
- Old Testament Essays
- Publisher
- Academy of Science of South Africa
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1010-9919 (ISSN-L)
- 2312-3621
- OpenAlex
- W2992796452
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Old Testament Essays (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Institutional Repository of LCC International University (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Keywords
- Benjamin, Judah, Joseph, Israelite monarchy, royal succession, Book of Judges, Book of Samuel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
