CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Posthumanist Ethics and ActivismDigital Education and SocietySustainability in Higher Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Posthumanism and educational research for sustainable futures

Open access
Kruger, Frans·2016·Journal of Education
DOI 10.17159/i65a04
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Karen Barad’s (2007) concept of intra-action and Rosi Braidotti’s (2013) nomadic posthumanism are employed in this article to problematise the notion of educational research for sustainable futures. In rejecting the hierarchical dualism of Cartesian objectivism, which places the human above the non-human, I challenge the stable selfcontained subject that presuppose a dialectical relation to the other on which most educational research is premised. Instead, in drawing on the work of Barad and Braidotti, subjectivity is posited as always in the process of becoming-other through the actualisation of new relations. In light of such a subjectivity, I consider the implications for educational research for sustainable futures. Furthermore, four avenues of thought are proposed on how educational research informed by posthumanism could contribute towards sustainable futures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17159/i65a04

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Barad, K. 2001. Re(con)figuring space, time and matter. In Dekoven, M. (Ed.). Feminist locations: global and local, theory and practice. New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press, pp.75-109.
  2. Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3): pp.801-831.
  3. Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
  4. Baugh, B. 2010. Theory. In Parr, A. (Ed.). The Deleuze Dictionary Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.282-284.
  5. Bennet, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.
  6. Bogost, I. 2012. Alien phenomenology, or what it's like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Bogue, R. 2011. Deleuze and Guattari and the future of politics: science fiction, protocols and the people to come. Deleuze Studies, 5: pp.77-97.
  8. Braidotti, R. 2006. The ethics of becoming imperceptable. In Boundas, C. (Ed.). Deleuze and philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.133-159.
  9. Braidotti, R. 2010a. Politics + Ecology. In Parr, A. (Ed.). The Deleuze Dictionary Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.211-213.
  10. Braidotti, R. 2010b. Lines of Flight + Suicide. In Parr, A. (Ed.). The Deleuze Dictionary Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.151-152.
  11. Braidotti, R. 2011. Nomadic theory: the portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.
  12. Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
  13. Clough, P. T. 2008. The affective turn: political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory, Culture and Society, 25: pp.1-22.
  14. Colebrook, C. 2014. The death of the posthuman: essay on extinction, Vol. 1 Ann Arbor: Open University Press.
  15. Coleman, R. and Ringrose, J. (Eds.). 2013. Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  16. Deleuze, G. 1988b. Foucault. (S. Hand, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  17. Deleuze, G. 1992. Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. (M. Joughin, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  18. Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  19. Deleuze, G. 2004. Desert islands and other texts 1953-1974 (D. Laoujade, Ed.). New York: Semiotext(e).
  20. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1983. Anti-oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. (R. Hurley, M. Seem and H.R. Lane Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  21. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1987. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  22. Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. 2002. Dialogues. (H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam, (Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  23. Dolphijn, R. and Van der Tuin, I. 2012. New materialism: interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open University Press.
  24. Foucault, M. and Deleuze, G. 1977. Intellectuals and power. In Bouchard, D.F. (Ed.). Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp.205-217.
  25. Fox N.J. and Alldred, P. 2015. New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4): pp.399-414.
  26. Guattari, F. 2000. The three ecologies. (I. Pindar and P. Sutton, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.
  27. Guattari, F. 2015. Transdisciplinarity must become transversality. Theory, Culture and Society, 32(5-6): pp.131-137.
  28. Hayles, N.K. 1999. How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  29. Hinton, P. 2013. The quantum dance and the world's 'extraordinary liveliness': refiguring corporeal ethics in Karen Barad's agential realism. Somatechnics, 3(1): pp.169-189.
  30. Horsthemke, K. 2009. Learning for the natural environment: the case against anthropocentrism. US-China Educational Review, 6(10): pp.22-30.
  31. Ingold, T. 2011. Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon: Routledge.
  32. Kruger, F. 2015. Experimenting with nomadic posthumanism: conceptualising education and rural learning ecologies differently. Alternation Special Edition, 16: pp.329-345.
  33. MacLure, M. 2013. The Wonder of Data. Cultural Studies <-> Critical Methodologies, 13(4): pp.228-232.
  34. Marks, J. 2010. Ethics. In Parr, A. (Ed.). The Deleuze Dictionary Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.87-89.
  35. Murris, K. 2016. The posthuman child: educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. Abingdon: Routledge.
  36. Pedersen, H. 2010. Is 'the posthuman' educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2): pp.237-250.
  37. Rotas, N. 2014. Ecologies of praxis: teaching and learning against the obvious. In Snaza, N. and Weaver, J. (Eds.). Posthumanism and educational research. New York: Routledge, pp.75-83.
  38. Snaza, N. 2013 Bewildering education. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1): pp.38-54.
  39. Snaza, N. and Weaver, J. 2014. Introduction: Education and the posthumanist turn. In Snaza, N. and Weaver, J. (Eds.). Posthumanism and educational research. New York: Routledge, pp.1-14.
  40. Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., Sandlin, J., Wallin, J. and Weaver, J. 2014. Towards a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2): pp.39-55.
  41. St. Pierre, E. A. 1997. Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10: pp.175-189.
  42. St. Pierre, E.A. 2013. The appearance of data. Cultural Studies <-> Critical Methodologies, 13(4): pp.223-227.
  43. Thrift, N. 2008. Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
  44. Vannini, P. 2015. Non-representational research methodologies: an Introduction. In Vannini, P. (Ed.). Non-representational methodologies: re- envisioning research. New York: Routledge, pp.1-17.
  45. Wolfe, C. 2010. What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  46. Malewski, E. (Ed.). Curriculum studies handbook: the next moment. New York: Routledge, pp.190-200.
  47. Zembylas, M. and Bozalek, V. 2014. A critical engagement with the social and political consequences of human rights: the contribution of the affective turn and posthumanism. Acta Academia, 46(4): pp.29-47.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kruger, F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR)
Corresponding author
Kruger, Frans
ORCID
Kruger, Frans
Venue
Journal of Education
Publisher
Academy of Science of South Africa
Published
2016
Issue
65
ISSN
  • 0259-479X (ISSN-L)
  • 2520-9868
DOI
10.17159/i65a04
OpenAlex
W3129176256
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
Keywords
posthumanism, intra-action, Karen Barad, Rosi Braidotti, sustainable futures, Cartesian dualism, subjectivity, becoming-other, human-nonhuman relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review