Cited by 26Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Longitudinal changes in muscle power compared to muscle strength and mass

Open access
Wiegmann, Sabine, Felsenberg, Dieter, Armbrecht, Gabriele, Dietzel, Roswitha·2021·Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Abstract

Objectives: The study reports longitudinal changes in grip strength, muscle mass and muscle power of lower extremities. The aim is to identify early muscular changes to improve the diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia. Methods: Grip strength was measured by hand dynamometer, muscle mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and muscle power by performing a chair rise test and two-leg jumps (2LJP) on the Leonardo Mechanograph®. Longitudinal changes were analysed using paired t-tests by age group and sex. Differences between groups in terms of the annual change were tested by Analysis of Variance and the Dunnett's test. Comparisons between the variables were performed using one sample t-tests. Results: Six-year changes were determined in 318 randomly selected healthy participants aged 20-90 years from Berlin. 2LJP declined significantly earlier in 20-39 years old women (-3.70 W/kg) and men (-5.97 W/kg, both p<0.001). This is an absolute annual decline of -0.46 W/kg in females and -0.75 W/kg in males. In the oldest age group, 2LJP showed the highest absolute annual loss with -0.99 W/kg in women and -0.88 W/kg in men. 2LJP was significantly different compared to all variables of muscle mass and strength (p<0.01). Conclusions: The results underline the importance of assessing muscle power using 2LJP during aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.17169/refubium-29868

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiegmann, S., Felsenberg, D., Armbrecht, G., & Dietzel, R.
Affiliations
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Venue
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Published
2021
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
13-25
OpenAlex
W3134099015
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
muscle power, muscle strength, muscle mass, sarcopenia, grip strength, aging, longitudinal change, sex differences, healthy older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Absorptiometry, Photon, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review