The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Negative effects of malachite green and possibilities of its replacement in the treatment of fish eggs and fish: a review
Open accessAbstract
Malachite green has been used as an effective compound to control external fungal and protozoan infections of fish since 1933 but it has never been registered as a veterinary drug for use in food fish because of its potential carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and teratogenicity in mammals. The present paper reviews negative side-effects of malachite green including its accumulation and persistence in fish that have been treated and describes other alternative substances for the treatment of fish and fish eggs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review
Bhatia, D., Sharma, N. R., Singh, J., & Kanwar, R. S. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 · Cited by 816
Metadata
- Authors
- Sudova, E., Machova, J., Svobodova, Z., & Vesely, T.
- Venue
- Veterinární medicína
- Published
- 2007-12-31
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 527-539
- ISSN
- 0375-8427 (ISSN-L)
- 1805-9392
- OpenAlex
- W2158873517
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negative effects of malachite green and possibilities of its replacement in the treatment of fish eggs and fish: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17221/2027-vetmed
- The paper
- Sudova, E., Machova, J., Svobodova, Z., & Vesely, T. (2007). Negative effects of malachite green and possibilities of its replacement in the treatment of fish eggs and fish: a review. Veterinární medicína. https://doi.org/10.17221/2027-vetmed
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
