The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining Twenty-First Century Skills
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012) · Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2 · Cited by 1,809
Pea, R. D. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6 · Cited by 1,047
Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024 · Cited by 629
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320 · Cited by 533
Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking
Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2011) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Venue
- National Academies Press eBooks
- Publisher
- National Academies Press
- Published
- 2001-09-27
- OpenAlex
- W3210169901
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17226/10019
- The paper
- Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. (2001). National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/10019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
