Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The National Academies recommended that universities verify every graduate program provides for these competencies and that students demonstrate achievement before receiving doctoral degrees.
“In its formal recommendations specifically for STEM PhD education, the first recommendation is, “Universities should verify that every graduate program that they offer provides for these competencies and that students demonstrate that they have achieved them before receiving their doctoral degrees.””
From Competency-based assessment for the training of PhD students and early-career scientists (2018) · cites this paper as The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) briefly outlined core competencies for STEM PhDs.
“In its recent report “Graduate STEM education for the 21st Century”, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018 briefly outlined core competencies for STEM PhDs.”
From Competency-based assessment for the training of PhD students and early-career scientists (2018) · cites this paper as The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Competency-based assessment for the training of PhD students and early-career scientists
Verderame, M. F., Freedman, V. H., Kozlowski, L. M., & McCormack, W. T. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34801 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Experiences of neurodivergent students in graduate STEM programs
Syharat, C. M., Hain, A., Zaghi, A. E., Gabriel, R., & Berdanier, C. G. P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149068 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Pearson, J., Giacumo, L. A., Farid, A., & Sadegh, M. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12050333 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Committee on Revitalizing Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Affairs, P. A. G., & National Academies of Sciences, E.
- Venue
- National Academies Press eBooks
- Publisher
- National Academies Press
- Published
- 2018-08-21
- OpenAlex
- W3111564559
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 39.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- National Academies Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- graduate education, STEM education, research training, higher education reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
