The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future
Abstract
Despite growing attention to research on women's health over the past decade, the health problems of some subgroups of women have continued to receive relatively little attention. Lesbians are one such subgroup. Although the body of research on lesbian health is growing, much of the research to date has methodological limitations, such as the lack of appropriate comparison groups, that make it difficult to draw clear conclusions about the health status and health risks of this group of women.The Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on Lesbian Health Research Priorities was convened in July 1997 to: 1. assess the strength of the science base regarding the physical and mental health of lesbians, 2. review the methodological challenges involved in conducting research on lesbian health, and 3. suggest areas for research attention.The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also contributing funding through the NIH.A primary charge of the committee was to organize and convene an invitational workshop to examine these issues. The workshop, held in October 1997, focused on the challenges involved in designing and conducting research on lesbian health, some of the contextual issues that can make it more difficult to conduct such research, and lesbians' risk for particular health conditions including cancer, mental health problems, substance abuse, HIV infection, and sexually transmitted diseases. Lesbians' use of and access to health care services were also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective
Krieger, N. (2001) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/30.4.668 · Cited by 2,155
Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients.
American Psychological Association (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0024659 · Cited by 624
Cochran, S. D. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.11.931 · Cited by 447
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health: Findings and Concerns
Dean, L., Meyer, I. H., Robinson, K., Sell, R. L., Sember, R., Silenzio, V. M. B., Bowen, D. J., Bradford, J., Rothblum, E., White, J., et al. (2000) · Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association · doi:10.1023/a:1009573800168 · Cited by 420
Gonzales, G., Przedworski, J., & Henning-Smith, C. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3432 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Venue
- National Academies Press eBooks
- Publisher
- National Academies Press
- Published
- 1999-05-11
- OpenAlex
- W232406826
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17226/6109
- The paper
- Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future. (1999). National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/6109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.