The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
The dynamics of writing and peer review at primary school
Open accessAbstract
The object of this research is a learning method that uses email correspondence to promote the development of narrative writing skills in year 4 and year 5 students. Focusing on the written production of episodes of adventure novels and peer review, this learning method was applied to four classes in the Paris region over a 1-year period. The classes were paired in such a way that some students were required to read and analyze texts produced by correspondents (advice givers) while others carried out revisions using peer advice and suggestions (advice receivers). To describe the dynamics of writing, revision and learning, a qualitative analysis of the texts and suggestions given or received by the student partners is carried out. A statistical analysis comparing the texts produced by students in both groups is used to corroborate the findings of the initial analysis. Students showed an increasing awareness and consideration of the key characteristics of the practiced genre, resulting in an improvement of the quality of the texts in the course of the revision process and throughout the year. The texts produced by the advice givers improved more than the texts produced by the advice receivers. The findings are attributed to greater self-reflection and successive reformulations fostered by the elaboration of advice and suggestions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
Stanovich, K. E. (1986) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.21.4.1 · Cited by 5,222
The Representation of Meaning in Memory
Anderson, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421786 · Cited by 2,061
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609
17 FROM ‘DISCOURSE IN THE NOVEL’
Bakhtin, M. M. (1994) · State University of New York Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781474471312-022 · Cited by 1,481
A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.
Hayes, J. R. (1996) · Cited by 1,442
Making the Writing Process Work: Strategies for Composition and Self Regulation
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. W. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 466
Allocated Academic Learning Time Revisited, or Beyond Time on Task
Stallings, J. A. (1980) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x009011011 · Cited by 456
The power of the written tradition
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-4538 · Cited by 442
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (ed.), The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Bautier, É. (2004). Formes et activités scolaires. Secondarisation, reconfiguration et différenciation sociale [Forms and school activities, secondarisation, reconfiguration, and social differentiation]. In N. Ramognino & P. Vergès (dir.), Le français hier et aujourd'hui: politiques de la langue et apprentissages scolaires. Hommage à Viviane Isambert-Jamati [French pasts and present. Language policies and education. Studies in honour of V. Isambert-Jamati] (pp. 49-67). Aix, France : Presses de l'Université de Provence.
- Crinon, J., & Marin, B. (2010a). Réviser à distance pour apprendre à écrire des textes narratifs [Distance revision in learning to write narrative texts]. Revue française de Linguistique appliquée, 7(2), 85-99.
- Hayes, J. R. (2004). What triggers revision? In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9-20). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., van Steendam, E., Toorenaar, A., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Observations of peers in learning to write. Practise and research. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 53-83. Retrieved from: http://www.jowr.org/articles/vol1_1/JoWR_2008_vol1_nr1_Rijlaarsdam_etal.pdf
Cited by
Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing: Learner Cognition and Engagement
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000161 · Cited by 326
The Effects of Giving Feedback on the Persuasive Writing of Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students
Philippakos, Z. A. T., & MacArthur, C. A. (2016) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.149 · Cited by 72
Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179 · Cited by 56
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., & Baikadi, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6
Xu, Z., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2022) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2021-0078 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Crinon, J.
- Corresponding author
- Crinon, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Writing Research
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-154
- ISSN
- 2030-1006 (ISSN-L)
- 2294-3307
- OpenAlex
- W2317429540
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Writing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- narrative writing, peer review, peer feedback, email correspondence, writing revision, elementary school students, adventure fiction, genre awareness, self-reflection, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
