The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The need to prioritize research, policy, and practice to address the overdose epidemic in smaller settings in Canada
Open accessAbstract
The majority of research and policy directives targeting opioid use and overdose prevention are based in larger urban settings and not easily adaptable to smaller Canadian settings (i.e., small- to mid-sized cities and rural areas). We identify a variety of research and policy gaps in smaller settings, including limited access to supervised consumption services, safer supply and novel opioid agonist therapy programs, as well as housing-based services and supports. Additionally, we identify the need for novel strategies to improve healthcare access and health outcomes in a more equitable way for people who use drugs, including virtual opioid agonist therapy clinics, episodic overdose prevention services, and housing-based harm reduction programs that are better suited for smaller settings. These programs should be coupled with rigorous evaluation, in order to understand the unique factors that shape overdose risk, opioid use, and service uptake in smaller Canadian settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There exist unique housing and substance use challenges in rural areas, including issues related to service access and availability of supports.
“There exists unique housing and substance use challenges in rural areas, including issues related to service access and availability of supports”
From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Bardwell and Lappalainen, 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bardwell, G., Scheim, A., Mitra, S., & Kerr, T. (2017). Assessing support for supervised injection services among community stakeholders in London, Canada. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 48, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.009. · DOI
- Fairbairn, N., Ross, J., Trew, M., Meador, K., Turnbull, J., MacDonald, S., et al. (2019). Injectable opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder: A national clinical guideline. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(38), E1049. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190344. · DOI
- Kerr, T., Mitra, S., Kennedy, M. C., & McNeil, R. (2017). Supervised injection facilities in Canada: Past, present, and future. Harm Reduction Journal, 14(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0154-1. · DOI
- MacKinnon, L., Socías, M. E., & Bardwell, G. (2020). COVID-19 and overdose prevention: Challenges and opportunities for clinical practice in housing settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 119, 108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108153. · DOI
- Mema, S. C., Frosst, G., Bridgeman, J., Drake, H., Dolman, C., Lappalainen, L., et al. (2019). Mobile supervised consumption services in Rural British Columbia: Lessons learned. Harm Reduction Journal, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0273-3. · DOI
- Moustaqim-Barrette, A., Papamihali, K., Crabtree, A., Graham, B., Karamouzian, M., & Buxton, J. A. (2019). Correlates of take-home naloxone kit possession among people who use drugs in British Columbia: A cross-sectional analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 205, 107609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107609. · DOI
- Parker, J., Jackson, L., Dykeman, M., Gahagan, J., & Karabanow, J. (2012). Access to harm reduction services in Atlantic Canada: Implications for non-urban residents who inject drugs. Health & Place, 18(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.016. · DOI
- Russell, C., Imtiaz, S., Ali, F., Elton-Marshall, T., & Rehm, J. (2020). ‘Small communities, large oversight’: The impact of recent legislative changes concerning supervised consumption services on small communities in Ontario, Canada. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 82, 102822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102822. · DOI
- Yang, C., Favaro, J., & Meacham, M. C. (2021). NEXT Harm Reduction: An online, mail-based naloxone distribution and harm-reduction program. American Journal of Public Health, 2021, e1–e5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306124. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review
Kerman, N., Polillo, A., Bardwell, G., Gran-Ruaz, S., Savage, C., Felteau, C., & Tsemberis, S. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109052 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bardwell, G., & Lappalainen, L.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Interior Health (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bardwell, Geoff
- ORCID
- Bardwell, Geoff
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Public Health
- Published
- 2021-03-29
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 733-736
- ISSN
- 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
- 1920-7476
- PMC
- PMC8225779
- OpenAlex
- W3150429760
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01DA044181)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- opioid overdose epidemic, small and medium-sized cities, rural areas, drug users, supervised consumption services, safer supply, opioid substitution therapy, virtual clinics, healthcare access equity, Canada
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Research, Public Health Practice, Needs Assessment, Policy, Epidemics, Drug Overdose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review