Cited by 40Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The need to prioritize research, policy, and practice to address the overdose epidemic in smaller settings in Canada

Open access
Bardwell, Geoff, Lappalainen, Leslie·2021·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

The majority of research and policy directives targeting opioid use and overdose prevention are based in larger urban settings and not easily adaptable to smaller Canadian settings (i.e., small- to mid-sized cities and rural areas). We identify a variety of research and policy gaps in smaller settings, including limited access to supervised consumption services, safer supply and novel opioid agonist therapy programs, as well as housing-based services and supports. Additionally, we identify the need for novel strategies to improve healthcare access and health outcomes in a more equitable way for people who use drugs, including virtual opioid agonist therapy clinics, episodic overdose prevention services, and housing-based harm reduction programs that are better suited for smaller settings. These programs should be coupled with rigorous evaluation, in order to understand the unique factors that shape overdose risk, opioid use, and service uptake in smaller Canadian settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17269/s41997-021-00504-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There exist unique housing and substance use challenges in rural areas, including issues related to service access and availability of supports.

    “There exists unique housing and substance use challenges in rural areas, including issues related to service access and availability of supports”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Bardwell and Lappalainen, 2021

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bardwell, G., Scheim, A., Mitra, S., & Kerr, T. (2017). Assessing support for supervised injection services among community stakeholders in London, Canada. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 48, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.009. · DOI
  2. Fairbairn, N., Ross, J., Trew, M., Meador, K., Turnbull, J., MacDonald, S., et al. (2019). Injectable opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder: A national clinical guideline. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(38), E1049. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190344. · DOI
  3. Kerr, T., Mitra, S., Kennedy, M. C., & McNeil, R. (2017). Supervised injection facilities in Canada: Past, present, and future. Harm Reduction Journal, 14(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0154-1. · DOI
  4. MacKinnon, L., Socías, M. E., & Bardwell, G. (2020). COVID-19 and overdose prevention: Challenges and opportunities for clinical practice in housing settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 119, 108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108153. · DOI
  5. Mema, S. C., Frosst, G., Bridgeman, J., Drake, H., Dolman, C., Lappalainen, L., et al. (2019). Mobile supervised consumption services in Rural British Columbia: Lessons learned. Harm Reduction Journal, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0273-3. · DOI
  6. Moustaqim-Barrette, A., Papamihali, K., Crabtree, A., Graham, B., Karamouzian, M., & Buxton, J. A. (2019). Correlates of take-home naloxone kit possession among people who use drugs in British Columbia: A cross-sectional analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 205, 107609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107609. · DOI
  7. Parker, J., Jackson, L., Dykeman, M., Gahagan, J., & Karabanow, J. (2012). Access to harm reduction services in Atlantic Canada: Implications for non-urban residents who inject drugs. Health & Place, 18(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.016. · DOI
  8. Russell, C., Imtiaz, S., Ali, F., Elton-Marshall, T., & Rehm, J. (2020). ‘Small communities, large oversight’: The impact of recent legislative changes concerning supervised consumption services on small communities in Ontario, Canada. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 82, 102822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102822. · DOI
  9. Yang, C., Favaro, J., & Meacham, M. C. (2021). NEXT Harm Reduction: An online, mail-based naloxone distribution and harm-reduction program. American Journal of Public Health, 2021, e1–e5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306124. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bardwell, G., & Lappalainen, L.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Interior Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Bardwell, Geoff
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
733-736
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W3150429760
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01DA044181)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid overdose epidemic, small and medium-sized cities, rural areas, drug users, supervised consumption services, safer supply, opioid substitution therapy, virtual clinics, healthcare access equity, Canada
MeSH terms
Canada, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Research, Public Health Practice, Needs Assessment, Policy, Epidemics, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review