CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship between Involvement in the Use of Information and Communication Technologies and Family Social Capital

Dubrov, Dmitry·2023·Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики
DOI 10.17323/1813-8918-2023-1-62-70
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study goal was to empirically test the direct and indirect effects of involvement in the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and family social capital. To test these effects, we interviewed 104 families (parents and adolescents, n = 208). The direct effect test showed that the involvement in ICT use is a significant predictor of family social capital. At the same time, there is an inverse relationship: the higher the level of involvement of family members in ICT use, the lower the level of family social capital and all its components, especially trust. This means that the more adolescents and their parents are involved in ICT use (Internet, tablets, phones and other gadgets), the less they trust each other, pay attention to needs and mutual support, and the relationship becomes more distant and formal. As we can see, the primary results obtained using the construct of “family social capital” confirm the “displacement hypothesis”, according to which involvement in ICT use reduces the time for contacts between family members and they “displace” direct interaction, making it formal. The indirect effect test showed that the involvement in ICT use is a significant mediator of the relationship between family social capital and subjective well-being. In this case, involvement in ICT use acts as a coping strategy if individuals are not satisfied with their relationships with relatives. The results obtained confirm the “social compensation hypothesis”.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17323/1813-8918-2023-1-62-70

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abar, C. C., Farnett, S., Mendola, K., Koban, K., & Sarra, S. (2018). Relationships between parent- child social media interactions and health behaviors. Journal of Substance Use, 23(3), 335-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2017.1410586 · DOI
  2. Attewell, P., Battle, J., & Suazo-Garcia, B. (2003). Computers and young children: Social benefit or social problem? Social Forces, 82(1), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0075 · DOI
  3. Barbosa Neves, B., Fonseca, J. R., Amaro, F., & Pasqualotti, A. (2018). Social capital and Internet use in an age-comparative perspective with a focus on later life. PLoS ONE, 13(2), Article e0192119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192119 · DOI
  4. Dubrov, D. I. (2016). Family social capital as a predictor of parents and adolescents' subjective well- being. Kazanskii Pedagogicheskii Zhurnal [Kazan Pedagogical Journal], 6, 184-190. (in Russian)
  5. Dubrov, D. I. (2019). Vnutrisemeinyi sotsial'nyi kapital kak factor mezhpokolennoi transmissii tsennostei [Family social capital as a factor of intergenerational value transmission] [PhD thesis]. HSE University. Moscow, Russian Federation.
  6. Dubrov, D. I. (2020). Information and communication technologies and family relations: harm or ben- efit? Sotsial'naya Psikhologiya i Obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 11(1), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110105 (in Russian) · DOI
  7. Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electron- ic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0135 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Community, & Society, 9(5), 582-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600965575 · DOI
  9. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00248 · DOI
  10. Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and commu- nication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 287- 303. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.287 · DOI
  11. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lee, S. J., & Chae, Y. G. (2007). Children's Internet use in a family context: Influence on family rela- tionships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640-644. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9975 · DOI
  13. McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 References · DOI
  14. McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540- 4560.00246 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mesch, G. S. (2003). The family and the Internet: The Israeli case. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 1038-1050. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404016.x · DOI
  16. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship for- mation on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(5), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.423 · DOI
  17. Siraj, A. (2018). Impact of Internet use on social capital: Testing Putnam's theory of time displacement in urban Pakistan. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 456-468.
  18. Tatarko, A. N., Maklasova, E. V., Lepshokova, Z. H., Galyapina, V. N., Efremova, M. V., Dubrov, D. I., Bultseva, M. A., Bushina, E. V., & Mironova, A. A. (2020). Assessment methodology of involve- ment in information and communication technology using. Sotsial'naya Psikhologiya i Obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 11(1), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110110 (in Russian) · DOI
  19. Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2014). Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce: Survey and state-level evidence from the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 94- 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dubrov, D.
Venue
Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики
Publisher
National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE)
Published
2023-03-17
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
62-70
ISSN
  • 2541-9226
  • 1813-8918
DOI
10.17323/1813-8918-2023-1-62-70
Cited by
0
References
5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review