The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic Narratives in China’s Bid for Discursive Hegemony
Open accessAbstract
Power in international relations implies not only the possession of outstanding material resources, but also the ability to proposeand popularize attractive ideas, values, and norms and thus control discourse. Scholars note that during the presidencyof Xi Jinping, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has joined the struggle for discursive hegemony. This change in China’sforeign policy requires systematic study, for which the concept of a strategic narrative has analytical value. As defined byA. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin and L. Roselle, strategic narratives “are a means for political actors to construct a sharedmeaning of the past, present, and future of international politics to shape the behavior of domestic and international actors.”This article provides an overview of strategic narratives as a conceptual lens to study international relations, summarizesthe existing research of strategic narratives in general and regarding the Chinese case in particular, and suggestsdirections for future studies. The core idea of Chinese strategic narratives is that the PRC is a new type of great power that iscapable of changing the existing unjust and conflict-prone world order. At the same time, China does not propose to radicallyrevise the international system – it portrays the world as divided into great powers and the rest. Overall, China’s strategicnarratives are characterized by a duality that reflects the complexity of China’s foreign policy interests and its attempt toexpand the field of opportunity. Aimed to support different agendas, narratives include references both to the “century ofhumiliation” and the more recent successful experience of China’s modernization. The content of the narratives suggeststhat China is mainly trying to attract the developing countries of the Global South and thus form its own group of followers.However, there is significant variation in communication processes, namely the formation, projection, and reception ofChina’s strategic narratives. The study of this variation, as well as the analysis of the effectiveness of Chinese narratives, isa promising direction for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“В рамках Национального проекта по созданию магистральной инфраструктуры Уганды компанией *Huawei* проложено более 3000 километров оптоволоконного кабеля19.”
From China’s Digital Silk Road initiative: directions and prospects of development, advantages and risks for Russia (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Socialization and hegemonic power
Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830003530x · Cited by 827
Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.185594 · Cited by 644
The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in international relations
Zhang, F. (2013) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066111421038 · Cited by 174
History, theory and the narrative turn in IR
Roberts, G. (2006) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210506007248 · Cited by 166
Examining Strategic Narratives in Chinese Official Discourse under Xi Jinping
Lams, L. (2018) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-018-9529-8 · Cited by 116
Communicating China to the World: Confucius Institutes and China's Strategic Narratives
Hartig, F. (2015) · Politics · doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12093 · Cited by 98
Narrating China's belt and road initiative
Zeng, J. (2019) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12662 · Cited by 75
The rise of China and its contest for discursive power
Lee, P. S. (2016) · Global Media and China · doi:10.1177/2059436416650549 · Cited by 72
China’s Strategic Narratives in Global Governance Reform under Xi Jinping
Yang, Y. E. (2020) · Journal of Contemporary China · doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1790904 · Cited by 67
How do strategic narratives shape policy adoption? Responses to China's Belt and Road Initiative
van Noort, C., & Colley, T. (2020) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210520000388 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [2]2. Alekseenkova E. S. (2020) Diskursivnaja sila KNR protiv normativnoj sily ES: kazus Italii [PRC Discursive Power vs. EU Normative Power: The Casus of Italy]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 64, no 5, pp. 62-72. Available at: http://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227- 2020-64-5-62-72 (in Russian). · DOI
- [5]5. J] [Strategic Narrative in Great Power Competition: The Game of Sino-US Diplomatic Discourse and Its Narrative Scenario [J]]. World Economics and Politics, no 5, pp. 51-79. (in Chinese).
- [12]12. Kinzelbach K. (2012) Will China's Rise Lead to a New Normative Order? An Analysis of China's Statements on Human Rights at the United Nations (2000-2010). Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, vol. 30, no 3, pp. 299-332. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290577895_Will_China's_rise_lead_to_a_new_normat ive_order_An_analysis_of_China's_statements_on_human_rights_at_the_United_Nations_2000 -2010 (accessed 10 June 2023).
- [16]16. Liao N. (2018) The Power of Strategic Narratives: The Communicative Dynamics of Chinese Nationalism and Foreign Relations. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations (A. Miskimmon, B. O'Loughlin, L. Roselle (eds)). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- [30]30. Xu J., Cao D. (2022) Guoji guanxi zhong de zhanlue xushi ji qi yingxiang jizhi tanxi [Analysis of Strategic Narratives in International Relations and Their Influence Mechanisms]. Pacific Journal, no 8, pp. 26-34 (in Chinese).
- [36]36. Zhao S. (2021) China's Big Power Ambition Under XI Jinping: Narratives and Driving Forces. New York: Routledge.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Port power 02: Chinese geoeconomic hopes and American geopolitical fears
Noorali, H., & Mamadouh, V. (2025) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104207 · Cited by 13
Soboleva, E. D. (2024) · Journal of Current Chinese Affairs · doi:10.1177/18681026241242489 · Cited by 4
Self-citationSidorenko, E. L. (2025) · Russian Journal of Economics and Law · doi:10.21202/2782-2923.2025.1.57-79 · Cited by 4
Soboleva, E. D., & Валентиновна, К. С. (2024) · World Economy and International Relations · doi:10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-119-128 · Cited by 3
Self-citationМилкова, А. А. (2025) · Analysis and Forecasting IMEMO Journal · doi:10.20542/afij-2025-2-82-92 · Cited by 2
Kebede, A. T., & Pohjonen, M. (2025) · Media War & Conflict · doi:10.1177/17506352251403008 · Cited by 2
In search of antagonistic other. Troubling threats and non-intervention
Neklyudov, N. N. (2023) · International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy · doi:10.17994/it.2023.21.4.75.7
China’s Stance in United Nations General Assembly Special Emergency Sessions on Ukraine
Aitzhanova, A., Weil, S., & Kaunert, C. (2026) · Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs · doi:10.1177/23477970261424606
Transnational Memory in Post-Soviet Central Asia as a “Resource of Soft Power”
Letnyakov, D. A. (2025) · International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy · doi:10.46272/it.2024.22.3-4.78-79.7
Strategic Narratives of Foreign Policy Identity: Russia vs European Union
Fadeeva, L. A., & Владимирович, Г. М. (2026) · World Economy and International Relations · doi:10.20542/0131-2227-2026-70-9-66-77
Metadata
- Authors
- Krivokhizh, S., & Soboleva, E.
- Affiliations
- National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
- ORCID
- Soboleva, Elena
- Venue
- International Organisations Research Journal
- Published
- 2023-07-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178
- ISSN
- 1996-7845 (ISSN-L)
- 2542-2081
- OpenAlex
- W4386754637
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Organisations Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Russian Science Foundation (23-28-00994)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Keywords
- strategic narratives, discursive hegemony, Chinese foreign policy, Xi Jinping, great power politics, international order, Century of Humiliation, modernization, Global South, narrative reception, international communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review