Cited by 7News Media Framing and Political CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

IMPROVING TRUST THROUGH ETHICAL LEADERSHIP: MOVING BEYOND THE SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY TO A HISTORICAL LEARNING APPROACH

Open access
Osifo, Omoregie Charles·2016·Journal of Media Critiques

Abstract

Former domain of an international peer-reviewed publishing website that featured various critical approaches on media and mass communication along with discussions on the developments in the cultural, social, and political spheres.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17349/jmc116201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Osifo, O. C.
Affiliations
University of Vaasa (FI)
Corresponding author
Osifo, Omoregie Charles
Venue
Journal of Media Critiques
Published
2016-12-17
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
11-24
ISSN
  • 2056-9785 (ISSN-L)
  • 2056-9793
OpenAlex
W2564583786
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Media Critiques (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
ethical leadership, trust, social learning theory, organizational trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review