The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
Deep learning techniques are growing in popularity within the field of artificial intelligence (AI). These approaches identify patterns in large scale datasets, and make classifications and predictions, which have been celebrated as more accurate than those of humans. But for a number of reasons, including nonlinear path from inputs to outputs, there is a dearth of theory that can explain why deep learning techniques work so well at pattern detection and prediction. Claims about “superhuman” accuracy and insight, paired with the inability to fully explain how these results are produced, form a discourse about AI that we call enchanted determinism. To analyze enchanted determinism, we situate it within a broader epistemological diagnosis of modernity: Max Weber’s theory of disenchantment. Deep learning occupies an ambiguous position in this framework. On one hand, it represents a complex form of technological calculation and prediction, phenomena Weber associated with disenchantment. On the other hand, both deep learning experts and observers deploy enchanted, magical discourses to describe these systems’ uninterpretable mechanisms and counter-intuitive behavior. The combination of predictive accuracy and mysterious or unexplainable properties results in myth-making about deep learning’s transcendent, superhuman capacities, especially when it is applied in social settings. We analyze how discourses of magical deep learning produce techno-optimism, drawing on case studies from game-playing, adversarial examples, and attempts to infer sexual orientation from facial images. Enchantment shields the creators of these systems from accountability while its deterministic, calculative power intensifies social processes of classification and control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Campolo and Crawford (2020) say that 'enchantment shields the creators of [AI] systems from accountability', while the actual mechanisms behind these systems can intensify 'social processes of classification and control' (Campolo and Crawford, 2020).”
From AI Séance: Recounts from designing artificial intelligence for transcendence, interpretive lenses and chance (2025) · cites this paper as Campolo and Crawford, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 · Cited by 5,427
How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196
Racial categories in machine learning
Benthall, S., & Haynes, B. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287575 · Cited by 110
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Ames, Morgan G. 2014. "Translating Magic: The Charisma of One Laptop per Child's XO Laptop in Paraguay." In Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America, edited by Eden Medina, Ivan da Costa Marques and Christina Holmes, 207-224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. __________. 2015. "Charismatic Technology." In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives, 109-120. AA '15. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21199. __________. 2018. "Deconstructing the Algorithmic Sublime." Big Data & Society 5 (1): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718779194. · DOI
- Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Bellman, Richard. 1957. Dynamic Programming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bennett, Jane. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Citron, Danielle Keats, and Frank A. Pasquale. 2014. "The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions." Washington Law Review 89 (1): 1-33.
- Collins, Harry. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Domingos, Pedro. 2012. "A Few Useful Things to Know About Machine Learning." Communications of the ACM 55 (10): 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755. · DOI · Paper page
- Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Michael Sauder. 2007. "Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds." American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1-40.
- Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Galison, Peter. 1994. "The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision." Critical Inquiry 21 (1): 228-66.
- Cs, Stat], December. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572. · arXiv
- __________, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Greenberger, Martin. 1962. Management and the Computer of the Future. New York: Wiley.
- Guidotti, R., Anna Monreale, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2019. "A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models." ACM Computing Surveys 51 (5): 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009. · DOI · Paper page
- Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
- Hu, Lily, Nicole Immorlica, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2019. "The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation." In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 259-268. FAT* '19. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287597. · DOI
- Hutson, Matthew. 2018. "AI Researchers Allege That Machine Learning Is Alchemy." Science. May 3. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/ai-researchers-allege-machine- learning-alchemy.
- Jannini, Emmanuele A., Ray Blanchard, Andrea Camperio-Ciani, and John Bancroft. 2010. "Male Homosexuality: Nature or Culture?" The Journal of Sexual Medicine 7 (10): 3245-53.
- Josephson-Storm, Jason A. 2017. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kleinberg, Jon, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2018. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (1): 237-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx032. · DOI · Paper page
- Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Lu, Zhou, Hongming Pu, Feicheng Wang, Zhiqiang Hu, and Liwei Wang. 2017. "The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Width." ArXiv:1709.02540 [Cs], September. http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02540. · arXiv
- Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
- Principe, Lawrence M., and William R. Newman. 2001. "Some Problems with the Historiography of Alchemy." In Secrets of Nature: Astrology and Alchemy in Early Modern Europe, 385-431. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Raghu, Maithra, Ben Poole, Jon Kleinberg, Surya Ganguli, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. 2017. "On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networks." In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2847-54. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/raghu17a.html.
- Riesebrodt, Martin. 1999. "Charisma in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion." Religion 29 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.1999.0175. · DOI
- Scott, Joan. 2017. Sex and Secularism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Selbst, Andrew, and Solon Barocas. 2018. "The Intuitive Appeal of Explainable Machines." Fordham Law Review 87 (3): 1085.
- Szegedy, Christian, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. 2013. "Intriguing Properties of Neural Networks." ArXiv:1312.6199 [Cs], December. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199. · arXiv
- Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
- Udry, J. Richard, and Kim Chantala. 2006. "Masculinity-Femininity Predicts Sexual Orientation in Men but Not in Women." Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (6): 797-809. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002193200500101X. · DOI
- Weber, Max. 1946. "Science as a Vocation." In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated by H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills, 129-56. New York: Oxford University Press.
- __________. 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge.
- Winkelman, Michael. 1982. "Magic: A Theoretical Reassessment." Current Anthropology 23 (1): 37- 66.
- Zeng, Jiaming, Berk Ustun, and Cynthia. Rudin. 2017. "Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Prediction." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 180 (3): 689-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12227. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards transparency by design for artificial intelligence
Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4 · Cited by 588
Learning theories for artificial intelligence promoting learning processes
Gibson, D., Kovanovic, V., Ifenthaler, D., Dexter, S., & Feng, S. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13341 · Cited by 155
Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems
Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., Langosco, L., He, Z., Duan, Y., Carroll, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594033 · Cited by 149
“Related to this is the adoption of discourse around ML systems that their capabilities are both scientifically impossible to explain, and yet deterministic in their societal impact [Campolo and Crawford 2020].”
BackgroundShifting Concepts of Value: Designing Algorithmic Decision-Support Systems for Public Services
Holten Møller, N., Shklovski, I., & Hildebrandt, T. T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society · doi:10.1145/3419249.3420149 · Cited by 97
Possible harms of Artificial Intelligence and the EU AI Act: fundamental rights and risk
Kusche, I. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2350720 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Campolo, A., & Crawford, K.
- Venue
- Engaging Science, Technology, and Society
- Published
- 2020-01-08
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 2413-8053
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 6
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17351/ests2020.277
- The paper
- Campolo, A., & Crawford, K. (2020). Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.277


