The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video
Abstract
This memo describes an RTP Payload format for the ITU-T Recommendation H.264 video codec and the technically identical ISO/IEC International Standard 14496-10 video codec. The RTP payload format allows for packetization of one or more Network Abstraction Layer Units (NALUs), produced by an H.264 video encoder, in each RTP payload. The payload format has wide applicability, as it supports applications from simple low bit-rate conversational usage, to Internet video streaming with interleaved transmission, to high bit-rate video-on-demand. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
H.264/AVC in wireless environments
Stockhammer, T., Hannuksela, M. M., & Wiegand, T. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2003.815167 · Cited by 538
Self-citationEnd-to-end quality aware optimization for multimedia clouds
Athanasopoulos, D., Politis, I., Lykourgiotis, A., Tselios, C., & Dagiuklas, T. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU) · doi:10.1109/temu.2016.7551931 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenger, S., Hannuksela, M. M., Stockhammer, T., Westerlund, M., & Singer, D.
- Publisher
- RFC Editor
- Published
- 2005-02
- OpenAlex
- W1613449145
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17487/rfc3984
- The paper
- Wenger, S., Hannuksela, M. M., Stockhammer, T., Westerlund, M., & Singer, D. (2005). RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video. https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc3984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
