The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Datagram Transport Layer Security
Abstract
This document specifies Version 1.0 of the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol.The DTLS protocol provides communications privacy for datagram protocols.The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.The DTLS protocol is based on the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol and provides equivalent security guarantees.Datagram semantics of the underlying transport are preserved by the DTLS protocol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SIP: Session Initiation Protocol
Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., & Schooler, E. (2002) · doi:10.17487/rfc3261 · Cited by 3,024
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
Bradner, S. (1997) · doi:10.17487/rfc2119 · Cited by 2,997
Postel, J. (1981) · doi:10.17487/rfc0793 · Cited by 2,122
Stream Control Transmission Protocol
Stewart, R., Tüxen, M., & Nielsen, K. (2022) · doi:10.17487/rfc9260 · Cited by 1,922
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3
Rescorla, E. (2018) · doi:10.17487/rfc8446 · Cited by 1,897
Self-citationDomain names - implementation and specification
Mockapetris, P. V. (1987) · doi:10.17487/rfc1035 · Cited by 1,698
The Internet Key Exchange (IKE)
Harkins, D., & Carrel, D. (1998) · doi:10.17487/rfc2409 · Cited by 1,012
Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
Kent, S., & Seo, K. (2005) · doi:10.17487/rfc4301 · Cited by 868
Stream Control Transmission Protocol
(2007) · doi:10.17487/rfc4960 · Cited by 717
Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol
(2005) · doi:10.17487/rfc4306 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues
Čolaković, A., & Hadžialić, M. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 · Cited by 825
Key management systems for sensor networks in the context of the Internet of Things
Roman, R., Alcaraz, C., Lopez, J., & Sklavos, N. (2011) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2011.01.009 · Cited by 295
VoCCN: voice-over content-centric networks
Jacobson, V., Smetters, D. K., Briggs, N. H., Plass, M. F., Stewart, P., Thornton, J. D., & Braynard, R. L. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Re-architecting the internet · doi:10.1145/1658978.1658980 · Cited by 253
Survey, comparison and research challenges of IoT application protocols for smart farming
Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., & Chatzimisios, P. (2020) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107037 · Cited by 253
Pawlowski, M., Jara, A., & Ogorzalek, M. (2015) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s151026838 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Rescorla, E., & Modadugu, N.
- Publisher
- RFC Editor
- Published
- 2006-04
- OpenAlex
- W2280477936
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 14
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Datagram Transport Layer Security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17487/rfc4347
- The paper
- Rescorla, E., & Modadugu, N. (2006). Datagram Transport Layer Security. https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc4347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
