The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
Abstract
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the "1id-abstracts.txt " listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ds.internic.net (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net (Europe), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR)
(2003) · doi:10.17487/rfc3626 · Cited by 4,880
A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
(2006) · doi:10.17487/rfc4271 · Cited by 965
Jones, M., Bradley, J., & Sakimura, N. (2015) · doi:10.17487/rfc7519 · Cited by 466
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
Hodges, J., Jackson, C., & Barth, A. (2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6797 · Cited by 198
Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Authentication Using Only a Password
Harkins, D., & Zorn, G. (2010) · doi:10.17487/rfc5931 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Narten, T., & Alvestrand, H.
- Publisher
- RFC Editor
- Published
- 2008-05
- OpenAlex
- W1709562738
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17487/rfc5226
- The paper
- Narten, T., & Alvestrand, H. (2008). Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs. https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc5226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
