The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Certificate Transparency
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, while DPKI systems offer a transparent and open architecture, the CAs in the traditional PKI model have also taken steps towards better transparency by offering services such as certificate t ransparency l ogs [95], through which all issued certificates are published on the CA website.”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [95]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Privacy-Preserving Trust Model Based on Blockchain for VANETs
Lu, Z., Liu, W., Wang, Q., Qu, G., & Liu, Z. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2864189 · Cited by 340
Centrally Banked Cryptocurrencies
Danezis, G., & Meiklejohn, S. (2016) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2016.23187 · Cited by 310
A blockchain-based PKI management framework
Yakubov, A., Shbair, W. M., Wallbom, A., et al. (2018) · IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) · doi:10.1109/noms.2018.8406325 · Cited by 171
IKP: Turning a PKI Around with Decentralized Automated Incentives
Matsumoto, S., & Reischuk, R. M. (2017) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.57 · Cited by 174
Post-Quantum Authentication in TLS 1.3: A Performance Study
Sikeridis, D., Kampanakis, P., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2020) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2020.24203 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurie, B., Langley, A., & Kasper, E.
- ORCID
- Laurie, B.
- Publisher
- RFC Editor
- Published
- 2013-06
- OpenAlex
- W4233819588
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- certificate transparency, digital certificates, public key infrastructure, certificate revocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
