The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TCP Extensions for High Performance
Abstract
This memo presents a set of TCP extensions to improve performance over large bandwidth*delay product paths and to provide reliable operation over very high-speed paths. It defines new TCP options for scaled windows and timestamps, which are designed to provide compatible interworking with TCP's that do not implement the extensions. The timestamps are used for two distinct mechanisms: RTTM (Round Trip Time Measurement) and PAWS (Protect Against Wrapped Sequences). Selective acknowledgments are not included in this memo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm
Henderson, T., Floyd, S., Gurtov, A., & Nishida, Y. (2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6582 · Cited by 1,410
Effective erasure codes for reliable computer communication protocols
Rizzo, L. (1997) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/263876.263881 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Borman, D., Braden, B., & Jacobson, V.
- Publisher
- RFC Editor
- Published
- 2014-09
- OpenAlex
- W1714781699
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TCP Extensions for High Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17487/rfc7323
- The paper
- Borman, D., Braden, B., & Jacobson, V. (2014). TCP Extensions for High Performance. https://doi.org/10.17487/rfc7323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
