Cited by 28Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentBioenergy crop production and managementLand Use and Ecosystem Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential land use competition from first-generation biofuel expansion in developing countries

Open access
G., Schoneveld·2010·Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks

Abstract

The Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF) harnesses the power of trees, forests and agroforestry landscapes to address the most pressing global challenges of our time – biodiversity loss, climate change, food security, livelihoods and inequity. CIFOR and ICRAF are CGIAR Research Centers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17528/cifor/003313

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Achten, W.M.J., Verchot, L., Franken, Y.J., Mathijs, E., Singh, V .P ., Aerts, R. and Muys, B. 2008 Jatropha biodiesel production and use. Biomass Bioenergy 32(12): 1063-1084.
  2. Anderson, L.E.C., Granger, W .J., Reis, E.J., Weinhold, D. and Wunder, S. 2002 The dynamics of deforestation and economic growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  3. Anonymous 2008 Agrofuels and the myth of the marginal lands. The Gaia Foundation, Biofuelwatch, the African Biodiversity Network, Salva La Selva, Watch Indonesia and EcoNexus, London and Oxford, UK. 8p.
  4. Barona, E., Ramankutty, N., Hyman, G. and Coomes, O.T. 2010 The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5: 024002 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002. · DOI
  5. British Petroleum (BP) 2009 BP statistical review of world energy. BP, London.
  6. Butler, R.A., Koh, L.P . and Ghazoul, J. 2009 REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes. Conservation Letters 2: 67-73.
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Global BioEnergy Partnership (GBEP) 2007 A review of the current state of bioenergy development in G8 +5 countries. FAO, GBEP, Rome.
  8. Fearnside, P .M. 2005 Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conservation Biology 19(3): 680-688.
  9. Fearnside, P .M. 2008 The roles and movements of actors in the deforestation of Brazilian Amazonia. Ecology and Society 13(1): 34 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol13/iss1/art23/.
  10. German, L., Schoneveld, G.C. and Gumbo, D. In press. The potential impact of bioenergy development in Zambia. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  11. Gopal, A.R. and Kammen, D.M. 2009 Molasses for ethanol: the economic and environmental impacts of a new pathway for the lifecycle greenhouse gas analysis of sugarcane ethanol. Environmental Research Letters 4: 044005. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044005. · DOI
  12. IUCN and UNEP 2009 The world database on protected areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC. Cambridge, UK.
  13. Kaimowitz, D. and Smith, J. 2001 Soybean technology and the loss of natural vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia. In: Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (eds.) Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation, 195-212. CIFOR and CABI Publishing, New York.
  14. Lapola, D.M., Schaldacha, R., Alcamoa, J., Bondeau, A., Koch, J., Koelking, C. and Priess, J.A. 2010 Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 3388-3393.
  15. Mpoyi, A. 2010 Les dimensions sociales et environnementales de projets d'acquisition a grande echelle des de droits fonciers en Republique Democratique du Congo. Paper presented at the World Bank Annual Conference on Land Policy and Administration. Washington, DC, 26-27 April.
  16. Pacheco, P. 2005 Populist and capitalist frontiers in the Amazon: diverging dynamics of agrarian and land-use change. Ph.D. Thesis. Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Massachusetts, USA.
  17. Piketty M.G., Bastos da Veiga J., Tourrand J.F., Negreiros Alves A.M., Poccar-Chapuis, R. and Thales, M. 2005 Les déterminants de l' expansion de l' élevage bovin en Amazonie orientale: conséquences pour les politiques publiques. Cahier Agricultures 14(1): 90-95.
  18. Rajagopal, D. and Zilberman, D. 2007 Review of environmental, economic, and policy aspects of biofuels. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4341. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  19. Rupilius, W . and Ahmad, S. 2007 Palm oil and palm kernel oil as raw materials for basic oleochemicals and biodiesel. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109: 433-439.
  20. Schoneveld, G.C., German, L.A. and Nukator, E. 2010 Towards sustainable biofuel development: assessing the effectiveness of the Ghanaian legal and institutional framework. Paper prepared for World Bank Annual Conference on Land Policy and Administration. Washington, DC, 26-27 April.
  21. Sugrue, A. 2008 Bioenergy production on marginal and degraded land: the potential social impacts. Paper prepared for the Joint International Workshop on High Nature Value Criteria and Potential for Sustainable Use of Degraded Lands. Paris, 30 June-1 July.
  22. van Gelder, J.W ., Bailis, R. and German, L. In press. Global and regional trends and scenarios in bioenergy trade and investment: an analysis of forest-rich countries in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  23. Venter, O., Meijaard, E., Possingham, H.P ., Dennis, R., Sheil, D., Wich, S. and Wilson, K. 2009 Confronting the carbon crisis - a safeguard for tropical forest wildlife. Conservation Letters 2: 123-129.
  24. Walker, R.T., Browder, J.O., Arima, E., Simmons, C.S., Pereira, R., Caldas, M., Shirota, R. and Zen, S. 2009 Ranching and the new global range: Amazônia in the 21st century. Geoforum 40(5): 732-745.

Cited by

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
G., S.
Venue
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks
Published
2010
OpenAlex
W102954439
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2021: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.94
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Stockholm Environment Institute
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
land use competition, first-generation biofuels, biofuel expansion, developing countries, land use change, bioenergy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review